If a fasting test is done using officially approved equipment then anything over 7 is considered diabetic but two readings are necessary. Between about 5.5 (according to which authority is doing the testing) and 6.9 is considered pre-diabetic. Some authorities say between 6 and 6.9.
You do seem to be pre-diabetic but a home meter does not count in diagnosing it.
Your other readings taken after eating or drinking are not too bad. The only official guidance is that your reading should be below 8.5 two hours after a meal. Your reading of 9.9 should not concern you since you only allowed one hour after breakfast.
Having said all that many people use personal and more stringent targets for their own purposes.
Forgot to ask, does this mean I need two fasting readings, or do they count the first initial test showing high glucose as one, I didn't ask what the reading of that was.Thank you so much for your reply Squire Fulwood, much appreciated. It gives me more of an idea now what the readings are.
Forgot to ask, does this mean I need two fasting readings, or do they count the first initial test showing high glucose as one, I didn't ask what the reading of that was.
Thank you so much for your reply, it has put my mind at ease, I can't think of anything that could have triggered these readings apart from the stress of trying to recover from labyrinthitis which is a horrible illness in itself. I'm not overweight, watch my diet, may tend to watch too much in case of hypos which I've had in the past so maybe my intake of complex carbs is more than what it should be, I don't eat junk foods sweets or cakes, don't drink or smoke. Total mystery but then that's the way it is isn't it unfortunately. Much appreciated, thanks againTo confirm diabetes, it is generally necessary to have either TWO FASTING blood samples taken on TWO separate occasions (a few days apart) where the individual's blood glucose level is at or above 7.0 mmol/L (Plasma) or these days it is often confirmed by One Fasting Blood Glucose test and what is the HbA1c test (which doesn't) require fasting (the sample can be taken at the same time as the Fasting Blood sample.
Results for the Fasting Levels below 5.0 mmol/L (Plasma) show that the individual doesn't have diabetes, and results between the 5.0 - 7.0 mmol/L (Plasma) show that the individual is Pre-Disposed to going on to developing diabetes at some later stage but as yet they haven't quite crossed the level for diagnoses. In this group many individuals are able by a change in lifestyle and/or diet to reverse this and prevent themselves from crossing the diabetic threshold for their diagnosis. It's definitely worth avoiding should you get the wake up call.
For a formal diagnosis of diabetes you would need two readings of over 7 or preferably another kind of a reading known as an Hba1c.
In the case of pre-diabetes the doctor might take action on one reading or any other clues that convince him. In my case I ended up in the diabetes clinic after one random test of blood that was taken when I was in the surgery for another reason. In those circumstances readings over 11 gets their attention.
I don't mind you asking. I was on medication for a time but when I learned what to do vis-a-vis lifestyle changes I was sufficiently successful to be taken off medication. Stay with this forum and in time the members will teach you how to do it too.Thank you again for replying, at least I know what to expect now, like yourself this was discovered during routine blood test for other conditions. Are you on medication or is yours 'lifestyle changes ' controlled ? Hope you don't mind me asking.
Thank you again, you've no idea how much the information you've given is such great help in alleviating my fears , let's hope I get my test soon.The Hba1c test is a test which can give the average blood sugar level for the las 2-3 months. Although you needn't fast for this one it may be that blood is taken for this test at the same time as a fasting blood test.
I don't mind you asking. I was on medication for a time but when I learned what to do vis-a-vis lifestyle changes I was sufficiently successful to be taken off medication. Stay with this forum and in time the members will teach you how to do it too.
I will do Squire, very kind of you to be of such great help, thank you againI don't mind you asking. I was on medication for a time but when I learned what to do vis-a-vis lifestyle changes I was sufficiently successful to be taken off medication. Stay with this forum and in time the members will teach you how to do it too.
Hi there, can I ask why you are concerned about hypo's (low blood sugar)? As it would appear that you are not a type one diabetic (if indeed you do end up being diagnosed as diabetic, it is far more likely to be as a type 2), it is extremely unlikely that you would experience a hypo unless you are on a glucose lowering medication.
Or do you mean Hyper (high blood sugar)?
Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
Hi. I;m one of those annoying people that insist on testing just to make sure they're in the safe zone with regard to their Blood Glucose levels. I'm almost in the pre-diabetic range and as there is a lot of Diabetes in my family history I'm making an effort to control my sugars now, out of choice rather than necessity. It was very good of your hubby to buy you a meter for you to check. Well done for getting on to the case before it spirals upward. On a side note, I've noticed some welcome health benefits just by keeping my levels on an even keel. It's gotta be good!
Thank you for the welcome totsy : )hi and welcome, everyone has already answered so just saying hi and try not to worry
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?