Excellent presentation. ! I completely concur. I don’t need to lose weight ( thankfully) but if I did I would cut dietary fat and use my body fat which is what I did until I got to my desired weight. I started Atkins induction 25+ years ago and never looked back. Being much younger than I am now I didn’t pay attention to the fat thing. I just cut the carbs and didnt add fat Later, I added fat and got fatter. I eat a 75-80% fat diet but MOSTLY plant fats like avocado, olive oil, mayo and some nuts and seeds. One ounce of cheese per day. I keep animal fats low. No chicken skins, bacon, steak fat, lard, etc. I eat lean proteins and add plant fats. If I eat animal fats I gain. If you eat dietary fat beyond your threshold your body will never go to it’s own fat. As Atkin advised, once you hit your goal weigh up your fat to maintain. Meaning lower it until you hit your goal.Starting to think I shouldn't pay attention to the fat macronutrient whatsoever as well as the caloric intake.
Perhaps I should only focus on:
1) eating a max of 30g of carbs (from above ground non-starchy vegetables) -- my threshold for good blood glucose
2) eating 75-80g of protein (for maintenance of lean tissue)
3) eating only the fat that comes along with the protein. (I eat a lot of eggs, cheese, non-lean cuts of meat, etc.). Will be about 50-55% of my macronutrients intake.
4) avoid fatty treats with very little protein-- as Phinney said my body should be satiated off adipose tissue, especially since I am morbidly obese
So once I reach 30g carbs from veggies, and 80g protein, over 3 meals, then I don't eat anything more for the day.
Reflecting on Dr. Bernstein's dietary advice:
With all the above said, Dr. Bernstein's advice of eating only the fat that comes along with protein makes some real sense now. At least in the case of the type 2's he treats, which are typically obese, the fat that comes along with the protein is about 50% of the dietary intake, the same as Phinney suggests in the video linked above.
I just watched the first few minutes of the video again to answer your question. Yeah that's exactly what I gather from the presentation Phinney did.May I ask if a person can be sated by taking into account adipose fat? Or have I misunderstood?
I am not sure about that. I used the term "adipose tissue", whereas Phinney used the term "body fat". Sorry for the confusion.And what of those who have little or no adipose fat but may have high levels of visceral fat?
Just google saturated fat and insulin resistanceI have to research more into various types of fats with respect to insulin resistance, never heard of that before. Thanks for sharing.
I just watched the first few minutes of the video again to answer your question. Yeah that's exactly what I gather from the presentation Phinney did.
I am not sure about that. I used the term "adipose tissue", whereas Phinney used the term "body fat". Sorry for the confusion.
Just watch out for the vegan propagandists on nutrition "facts"Just google saturated fat and insulin resistance
Yeah I am familiar, e.g., with Michael Greger's reference to the frankenmouse study with respect to insulin resistance and saturated fat intake. Also he unfairly says that after going back to carb diet from high fat diet it made insulin resistance worse, without explaining it was only temporary for a day or two, giving a chance to re-adapt to sugar based diet. Just like it takes time to keto adapt, it takes time to sugar adapt. I recommend sticking with one diet and not going back and forth -- and certainly not making crazy claims that one or the other does harm to you when it's just a short adaption phase.Just watch out for the vegan propagandists on nutrition "facts"
That's kind of a misrepresentation of what he really says.. and your thread title completely misrepresents what he says.Phinney gave an example of a person losing weight whose BMR was 2800. He suggested a dietary intake of 1400 calories, and that adipose tissue contribute 50% of the total energy the body consumes.
That's kind of a misrepresentation of what he really says.. and your thread title completely misrepresents what he says.
He says eating fat to satiety means that people tend towards 1400 calories not that that should be their target. A subtle but very significant difference. Eating fat to satiety means not counting fat and calories but eating until you feel full then stopping. Some people who don't have easy access to their fat stores (due to insulin resistance maybe) may not be able to make up the difference and so may only achieve metabolic slowdown by eating lower calories. This is where a lot of people trying to follow a ketogenic diet make mistakes by being too numbers driven. Listening and recognising signals from your body is more important than MyFitnessPal figures.
I don’t necessarily think I can fairly listen to my body for satiation if I am eating an extra 1000 calories of fat per day beyond what Phinney says morbidly obese people tend to consume
Thank you, I own both of the first two books you mentioned and have read them. I haven't read the last one, I'll have to check that out.If you are getting into this much detail there are two books you should read.
- The Art and Science of Low Carbohydrate Living: An Expert Guide to Making the Life-Saving Benefits of Carbohydrate Restriction Sustainable and Enjoyable by Jeff S. Volek PhD RD (Author), Stephen D. Phinney MD PhD
If you want a 3rd book to cover all the bases
- The Complete Guide to Fasting by Jason Fung
- Living Low Carb Paperback by CNS Jonny Bowden
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?