That does sound like the screening programme has seen what they think is proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Patients referred to the hospital eye service for this should get an appointment in ophthalmology with 6 weeks of the date the screening photos were taken. Further tests will be given at the hospital to confirm whether PDR is actually present. If so, appropriate treatment would be offered.]
Hi @Dark Horse this was my letter. Presuming this is pretty much the same as the one you described? The wording worries me slightly!
"Your test result showed that you have signs of advanced sight-threatining retinopathy. This means there were serious changes to the blood vessels in the retina at the back of your eye.
We are referring you to a specialist who will discuss options to prevent sight loss. You will get this within a few weeks
HiHi all and @Dark Horse
Just been for my appointment. Had all the usual photos and examination. It was quite a brief consultation but essentially went like this:
- On the initial screening 3 weeks ago, they noticed lots of what looked like small spots, suggesting new blood cell growth. On today's screening they cannot see any evidence of blood cells growing which is a positive sign.
- There is however a bleed behind each eye. He thinks there is a slim chance that these might be obscuring the small spots spotted originally. So I am booked in for a dye test on the Christmas eve and see the consultant again on new years eve. He wanted to make sure this wasn't the case. He feels the small spots and/or bleeding may if been because of my sudden control.
So all in all, potential positive that I'm not showing the small spots on the retinopathy. However, bleed between both eyes and he said he imagines I'm displaying anything from moderate to severe/significant retinopathy.
Would love to welcome thoughts and people with similar experiences if reading! And how worried I need to be about the bleeds, success rates and if I'm wrong to be feeling a tad more positive!
Can repeated low blood sugars such as hypos cause bleeds also?
Thanks!
Hi
Glad you got to your screening appointment and are now in the system for regular review. Retinopathy can progress slowly bearing in mind that they picked up changes across 5 years to prompt this referral. It is likely that on the next appointment and with continued tight control your eyes will remain stable with 'background changes' that are not unusual for someone who's had type 1 for 20 years plus including a turbulent period (Ken Silvas the Australian pathologist mentioned this in the context of the damage done in different age group from having higher blood sugars).
It can be a shock to see that there were consequences to a period of unstable blood sugars. It was to me anyway as I thought that I was immortal in my 20s having been diabetic since age 10.
Like you I had some roller coaster blood sugars whilst a young adult but what really accelerated my retinopathy was a pregnancy in that whilst pregnancy I was well controlled and then all hell broke loose again once I'd had my little girl and found it difficult to focus on my own health. My feeling is and this is hard to confirm, that it was the up and down nature of my control plus growth hormones involved in pregnancy that exacerbated the rapid proliferation of my leaky blood vessels that then lead to major bleeding. So it seems having stable blood sugars will help you prevent the damage and subsequent repair attempts that cause the problem.
As to your question now we have freestyle libre we can look at time in range and see if having a good consistent average is better than a very spikey profile which is information that the hba1c doesn't give us!
Can talk more about treatment I had 17 years ago (laser and then an op) but suspect you are nowhere near that yet and things have probably moved on anyway.
Yes makes sense I think.Hi @NicoleC1971,
Thankyou ever so much for your reply.
That's really interesting. I'm already in the process of getting a freestyle libre monitor just for ease really! I still get my high and low warning signs, but have a bit more trouble gauging which direction my blood sugar is currently traveling in so that should be a great help.
I'd really like to hear about your treatment even if it was a while ago. Have you had any major issues from the treatment, hows the sight now etc.
I've just highlighted a bit you said in bold. At this stage he's said I'm looking at moderate to significant retinopathy (although no sign of small blood cells attempting to grow as originally thought, looks more like a bleed behind each eye) are you suggesting that it's possible it is a background retinopathy at the moment, just with some bleeds? Or that I could remain at my current stage with tight control and the ''backround changes and remaining stable'' will keep me at my current state and not improve the retinopathy (or the bleeds)?
Hope that makes sense!
Yes makes sense I think.
I feel it would be wrong to say where you are but the aim of the game is clearly is to stop progression by getting monitored regularly then treated if anything does develop. If you have no active bleeds and haven't been sent for treatment it sounds as if it might be background bleed/swelling. Are you being seen in 3 months?
Treatment - I had background retinopathy with no changes to may vision and then it accelerated over Summer 2003 (5-8 months after the birth of my daughter).
I had a many cycles of laser treatment which was uncomfortable and stopped me from driving just after it had been done. I had the same dilation drops put in that you will have had during your check ups. Then a technician tried to seal off the bleeding vessels for about 30 minutes per eye.
That does usually work but for me it didn't for the afore mentioned reasons (wobbly blood sugars and stress I think) so in about September 2003 I had a major bleed in 1 eye but could still drive. Got signed in for a vitrectomy.
I took myself off the road and haven't driven anything more than a bike since.
Later on that year, I lost sight in the other eye.
It was a bit scary but my surgeries (double vitrectomy) got brought forward to January and March of that year.
Both successful and my vision is reduced (about the 2nd or 3rd line of that sight chart) but I have a bus pass and cycle a lot. It has got me into fitness and I now have 3 children and work full time so it hasn't hindered me. My eyes are totally stable now though it will probably speed up a need for cataracts op at some point.
There are no guarantees around all of this but I think I was lucky to have a great surgeon and to have this happen in 2003 where in prior years my condition might have led to total blindness.
Still I hope you remain at base camp with your condition which will make all the finger pricking worthwhile though swiping will be much easier so hope you jump through those fsl hoops too.
From memory I think it was as if a curtain came down over the eye. Prior to that there had been floaters though peole do get floaters and do not go on to have a full blown bleed.That's really interesting @NicoleC1971 . Can I ask, when you lost your sight in the eye and the major bleed did you suddenly wake up one day like that or was it progressive symptoms over months/weeks/days?
I'm glad to hear you are stable now. To answer your questions with where I am.
- Initial retinopathy screening mid November. Saw signs of advanced retinopathy and small spots of blood vessels attempting to grow.
- 8th of December , Consultation at opthalmology today and further photographs and screenings. No sign of the small spots of blood vessels, but bleeding spotted in both eyes. Wants a dye test to make extra sure nothing is hiding behind the bleed rather than jumping straight into laser. (Said looked anything from moderate to significant retinopathy)
- Dec 24th - dye test and further photographs
- Dec 31sr - consultation appointment to discuss dye results and what's next
I'm afraid that I don't recognise your description of what was found at you hospital examination - I think something may have got lost in translation. It sounds to me like the screening service suspected new vessel growth which wasn't seen at your hospital examination but the ophthalmologist wants to be sure so has recommended a Fundus Fluorescein Angiography (FFA) which is explained here:- https://www.guysandstthomas.nhs.uk/resources/patient-information/eye/fundus-fluorescein.pdfHi @NicoleC1971,
Thankyou ever so much for your reply.
That's really interesting. I'm already in the process of getting a freestyle libre monitor just for ease really! I still get my high and low warning signs, but have a bit more trouble gauging which direction my blood sugar is currently traveling in so that should be a great help.
I'd really like to hear about your treatment even if it was a while ago. Have you had any major issues from the treatment, hows the sight now etc.
I've just highlighted a bit you said in bold. At this stage he's said I'm looking at moderate to significant retinopathy (although no sign of small blood cells attempting to grow as originally thought, looks more like a bleed behind each eye) are you suggesting that it's possible it is a background retinopathy at the moment, just with some bleeds? Or that I could remain at my current stage with tight control and the ''backround changes and remaining stable'' will keep me at my current state and not improve the retinopathy (or the bleeds)?
Hope that makes sense!
I'm afraid that I don't recognise your description of what was found at you hospital examination - I think something may have got lost in translation. It sounds to me like the screening service suspected new vessel growth which wasn't seen at your hospital examination but the ophthalmologist wants to be sure so has recommended a Fundus Fluorescein Angiography (FFA) which is explained here:- https://www.guysandstthomas.nhs.uk/resources/patient-information/eye/fundus-fluorescein.pdf
If the FFA shows no new vessels, you would likely be monitored and advised to main good control of diabetes and blood pressure in order to reduce the risk of further progression.
It may be due to slight swelling of the macula which might clear up by itself or, as your consultant has said, might need treatment at some stage. Your ophthalmologist will be monitoring this - make sure you attend all eye appointments and continue to work at keeping good diabetic control.Hi all,
Just to update.
Went for my dye test yesterday. Showed what the consultant expected and he fit me in 2 hours later to do laser on my right eye.
I think he did approx 200 shots all around the right eye. He said the reason for my slight blur spots near my central vision on my right were due to blood spots that had leaked into the macula. He said that isn't good but to see how laser goes and this is definitely the right thing to do for now. He said he seemed happy with how the laser went, only aftercare instructions were painkillers for next 24 hours! He said there was also a chance my eye will fight the laser and my macula may swell which I would need an injection for.
I am booked in on the 7th for another dye test to see if I need anything doing to me left eye.
Yesterday post laser I didn't notice too much difference to my right eye vision bar a bit of light sensitivity and discomfort. Today since waking up my right eye is considerably blurry compared to normal. Presuming this is just the after effects of the surgery, nothing to worry about and should sort itself within a few days?
Honestly thank you so much!@domoboy don't worry about it, it's fine!
Well I was diagnosed Type 1 November 2016, I'd noticed my vision wasn't the best just before that, I mentioned it on a forum and was told by more experienced members to leave it, it was normal, it would get better etc and I did for a couple of weeks but my gut told me something wasn't right, I could barely read, bright red numbers on a clock were very dull and I struggled to be able to tell what the numbers were so I booked into the optician and was referred right away to ophthalmology, I was seen early on in December and diagnosed with diabetic macular oedema in both eyes due to a plummet in hba1c they believe, anyway I was booked in to receive a course of 3 injections in each eye over 3 months, each eye done a week apart, I had my first one before Christmas 2016, the thought scared the hell out of me but it really wasn't as awful and terrifying as I'd thought, they clean your eye, tape your eyelids open, insert a spring between to make sure it stays open, numb your eye with a swab, mark exactly where they are going to insert the needle, apply some more anaesthetic and then do your injection, I had bubbles in my sight for around half an hour after but there are different types of injections and I had 2 types, 1 type for 1 eye and 1 type for the other, it wasn't sore afterwards unless I forgot and rubbed it, my sight was off for the rest of the day, so much so I needed someone to tell me what my BG was when I tested and had to rely on the clicks for my insulin but I woke up the next morning and the improvement was amazing, I could see the bright red numbers again, after my course was done the ophthalmology consultant said I was the best case he'd seen and dealt with after the treatment, I have required a couple of top up injections since, then for the lasering it is worse in my experience than the injections, they can't see nerves so do occasionally catch them and it is on the nippy side but it only lasts a second and they will allow you to have a breather if it becomes too much, I had both eyes done in the same session, again vision was off for the rest of the day and my eyes felt very gritty when I blinked but nothing unbearable
Sorry I haven't read your full post but will do that this afternoon and sorry if I've babbled too much!
xx
You'll be fine! Don't get worked up about it or anything as it really isn't as bad as what you think it's going to be, good luck! Do let me know how you get on pleaseHonestly thank you so much!
Very re assuring to read. I've had a session of laser in each eye so far in December and January, then I'm having more laser tommorow afternoon for the retinopathy and injections on Monday for the macular edema!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?