Thanks very much for posting that, Noblehead. I think it's the same study that was posted earlier in the thread. Some points I would make on thisThis following is a small scale study about needle reuse and there's further references at the bottom of the article:
http://www.journalofdiabetology.org/Pages/Releases/FullTexts/FourthIssue/OA-1-JOD-10-024.aspx
Or what??? Or they would refuse to supply you? I would have refused. That really makes my blood boil (ok it doesn't take much).I couple of weeks back I was at my chemist picking up a prescription.
While I was waiting I was called in to the back room & asked to sign a document basically stating I understood the directions of my medication..
The chemist interviewed me making sure I was clear on my prescription use including the once only use of needles...
Or what??? Or they would refuse to supply you? I would have refused. That really makes my blood boil (ok it doesn't take much).
Sean, we all know they are free in the UK, we are thinking about saving the NHS money not ourselves.
Thanks very much for posting that, Noblehead. I think it's the same study that was posted earlier in the thread. Some points I would make on this
- Note that it mentions needle deformation is visible on electron micrographs. That I can believe. But the popular images on the web of deformed needles are from optical microscopes of maybe x10 - x20 power. Electron microscopes have power of up to x10,000,000. The images on the web are not electron micrographs.
- Pain is reasonably solid finding. But the users on here who have done needle re-use are saying to discard the needle if it is painful. That wasn't an option in this study as the experimenters controlled when needles were replaced - in practice, few would continue with a needle once it started to hurt, and that alone would reduce the differences seen between the 3 groups in the needle study.
- However the pain findings are actually a little odd, because reported pain increases even for the single use group, and the 21-use group reported much less pain after 12 uses than the 12-use group did (40% vs 60%), which is pretty much impossible to explain causally, since at that point both groups had used their needles 12 times. The likely explanation is random variation given the small sample size, only 15 patients per group.
- While they showed a small (26.6% vs 33.3%) contamination increase between 1-use needles and 21-use needles, they didn't test the needle prior to use. Needles are not guaranteed sterile when issued.
- The observed bacteria were all harmless. So there is no evidence of harm, only a theoretical small increased risk of harm IF harmful bacteria were to proliferate on the needle, which the study did not find.
- They find evidence of increased hyperemia, which is noteworthy, but they don't demonstrate any link between hyperemia and lipoma or lipophypertrophy, nor do they adduce a reference for this link. Maybe some of their references establish this link - not clear?
- One of the most interesting things about this study is that it reports how prevalent needle re-use is in the real population. That suggests that actually the whole diabetic population is a massive uncontrolled experiment in needle re-use. We can then draw some conclusions from what we don't see in the whole diabetic population. We don't see endemic skin infections or lipohypertrophy.
I couple of weeks back I was at my chemist picking up a prescription.
While I was waiting I was called in to the back room & asked to sign a document basically stating I understood the directions of my medication..
The chemist interviewed me making sure I was clear on my prescription use including the once only use of needles...
Regarding the needles & indeed lancets, I assured the chemist I was clear on the "guidelines" however in the real world regarding the bolus out & about I can't say I practice this.. But fully understand the logic behind the guide.
Incidentally it is possible to slide the cover back on a Novopen classic & a "Clickstar" without damaging or even touching the needle fitted for a consecutive use....
My pharmacy does these medicine reviews too every 12 months although I try to avoid them and say I'm too busy, it's just to check that you are taking your meds according to the manufacturers instructions or as your Dr directed.
Yep, I guessed as much...
I think the crux of it is that there are these needle use guidelines that are advocated for a reason.. "Pain limitation, stable/accurate insulin delivery" ..
But let's face it. This is the real world.. I didn't come on this forum to be led on a guilt trip. I am informed as much as I am entertained..
Whatever the point given on this subject...
Paul, how about adducing any kind of actual evidence to back up your opinion on needle re use, before characterising us as potential baby murderers?
.
I really AM out of this conversation now and you are now going on my 'Ignore' list on here as I no longer wish to interact with you again on this forum.
I'm sorry I annoyed you. I did think you were being quite judgemental in your comments. It's always better to keep the discussion calm and reasonable.
When I used the pen I couldn't tell you how often I changed the needle. Probably when I changed the cartridge or when it got painful.
And I injected through clothes. No infections, no lumps or bumps. I've probably got cotton and denim as part of my DNA now.
I'm a terrible diabetic I know. But at one stage I was told by my hospital that I had to buy the needles so this is where it started.
Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?