I've read vast amounts about diabetes, diets and drugs over the past eight months or so. I try to assess each item as I read it, for example, is this the ravings of an obsessed quack, the chatter of a confused amateur, a well researched scientific paper or a sensible report on observations? Or is it journalistic nonsense or more propaganda from the drug companies? I do have a scientific training (mainly in organic chemistry and biology), so this helps a lot, as much with analytical thinking as with actual knowledge of facts. Sometimes the mad stuff is quite interesting and can present an idea worth thinking about, or trying to find out more about it - after all low carb was in the "mad" category! I try and draw a sensible (for us) conclusion from what I read. My training was all about low fat and lots of wholemeal carbs and this time last year I would have said that it was the only sensible way to eat, but now, with more reading, thinking and diabetes thrown into the melting pot, I've become evangelical about low carb - its certainly given results beyond all expectations!
I would like to think I was still open to reason, good research and to new ideas, but on the "don't go low carb" theme, all I'm coming across at the moment is repetition of weak arguments, designed to maintain the status quo.
sally