Hi, this is my first post, it seems I don't have diabetes but I did have the glucose tolerance test - blood taken, then drank lucozade, waited an hour and more blood taken.
I wanted the test done because for the previous month or two I was feeling strange if I did not eat for 5 or 6 hours. I would feel woozy and nauseous, spaced out and would go white and clammy. I thought it might be symptomatic of being "hypo". My friend has diabetes and he tested me one day with his Accucheck thing and the result was 7.6 which he said was high and advised me to get a proper test.
So, I did and that is where my question comes - the result of the first sample was 5.4 which I believe is fine, but the result of the sample after the Lucozade and the hours wait was 2.7 which I believe is very low. Below 4 is not normal is it?
I feel the need to ask here because my GP was quick to dismiss the result even though she admitted it was very low.
There was a note on the results (from the lab I assume) which said, "was he actually inactive in the hour interval?", which tells me they considered it abnormal. I was inactive, I sat in a chair and that is all.
I am afraid my GP is one of those that doesn't listen and her attitude of not being concerned about a result of 2.7 has left me confused.
If 2.7 is way below normal, how can she not be interested in that? As far as she is concerned the test results show I am not diabetic and that is the end of that.
I do not have any other health factors (that I know of) that could affect the result
This isn't a rant about my GP however, what I am hoping for is for someone to give me some advice about what to do now? Just accept everything is OK? Ask for another test? I have no confidence in my GP.
Thanks.