According to the ISO standard for meters, for readings below 4.2 mmol, each meter is allowed to be out by +/- 0.83 mmol/l so two meters in parallel can be up tp 1.66 between them, and still be considered 'accurate'I had dinner and an hour later felt like I was having a hypo so I firstly used my freestyle lite meter and it said 4.1. So I got the Dario and it said 5.1. So I was thinking ok maybe not a hypo. So I go back to freestyle lite and it gives me 4.2 and then go back to Dario and it gives me 4.2. Now I did all this in less than a minute. Weird how the Dario gave me numbers that was almost a mmol out. Well anyhow I decided I better treat the hypo as wasn't feeling too good.
This **** pain fluctuating on me is making my sugar levels fluctuate... it's really annoying me.
Yup. My NEO repeats well which is why I don't trusr the SD. There will always be some variation in readings even on the same drop with same meter.Yeh I guess our bodies usually don't lie when we're in trouble. I definitely had the usual hypo symptoms. It looks like my freestyle lite was more consistent with readings.
PAcc
According to the ISO standard for meters, for readings below 4.2 mmol, each meter is allowed to be out by +/- 0.83 mmol/l so two meters in parallel can be up tp 1.66 between them, and still be considered 'accurate'
I use a NEO and an SD Codefree, and I am getting up to 3.5 between them when my body is clearly suffering a low bgl event So if the SD reads 6 or lower, I have to assume a hypo may be beckoning. I trust my NEO at low levels since it reflects my physical symptoms. Both of my meters always pass their calibration checks so I could not get a refund.
EDIT: To make matters worse, the NEO is calibrated for 'whole blood' and the SD is calibrated for 'Plasma', so the SD wil always read 12% higher than the NEO by design, Thus the 3,5 I report above is uncorrected for this.
Hi Mep,
I'm also finding this so frustrating as I have two meter first one easylife that reads whole blood and a codefree that reads plasma ( this reads mg/dl rather than mmol/l, first rookie mistake) even after using the calculator on this site to convert the plasma to whole blood reading it still seems high, while the easylife reads low aarrghh!. I bought the control solution to check the accuracy but the high solution range is from 8.6 to 12.4 which is a big difference.
I understand getting the numbers down is the most important thing but which one do I trust !!! Just tested and one says 4 and the other 5.6, have had in 7s and 10s.
Wondering if the whole blood or plasma is more accurate? I have ordered a codefree in mmol/l so hopefully this might read between the two!!!
Generally I make my decisions on what my NEO reads, and also how I feel since I get definite signs when I go into hypoland. I am Hypo Aware, thankfully. The SD is backup / confirmation that the NEO has not misread, a rare occurence indeed.When you have your quoted 6 on the SD, do you do anything about it, if you reckon it is beckoning a hypo??
Generally I make my decisions on what my NEO reads, and also how I feel since I get definite signs when I go into hypoland. I am Hypo Aware, thankfully. The SD is backup / confirmation that the NEO has not misread, a rare occurence indeed.
Now that I am 'fat adapted' on LCHF and have relatively stable bgl ranges, then for me a 'low' reading is not something I panic about so I do not always respond by taking extra carbs. I do take action if it is a 4hrPP result, since this is my bedtime status, and I do not want a hidden hypo while I dream. The other time I may take action is if I need to drive.
Since it is only the Gliclazide that could really give me a problem, and I now understand how it affects me over time, then I can be more relaxed about it than if I was on insulin or a more potent cocktail. Thus I raise the warnings about those meter calibration issues and the ISO since it can be more significant a problem for others, especially where using a single meter only which is Plasma Calibrated: these users may well be unaware that their meter is giving higher result than shown in NICE /DVLA or even the Newbie infopak given out by @daisy1. If they are not hypo aware then this could be a dangerous situation for them since they would not react to a 6.0 reading
I have on several threads here published graphs I have taken showing that my SD is always higher than my NEO. The two meters track each other quite closely when averaged over time, but can differ wildly on a moment by moment sample. Personally, if I get more than 3 mmol/l difference then i re-test since that indicates a misread, but if both results are both 8 or more then I have to allow greater leeway due to error being percentage of reading
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?