actually that’s typically at around an hour, depending how much fat and fibre is present too though as these can delay the highest point. 2 hrs is when in a non diabetic has returned to close to pre meal levels after the highest post earlier So we attempt to do likewise.The 2 hour gap from starting to eat until the post-meal test is when, on average, your reaction to a meal is at its highest.
Doesn’t mean it’s a healthy way to eat though or you wouldn’t be storing up problems for the future if that were a common way to eat. We only see the problem in our blood levels after it’s been building for years with ever increasing insulin resistance and insulin levels working double time to keep glucose normal, until it can’t manage anymore.So if I were to have a starting blood glucose of 5.5 before eating, then eat a meal high in carbs and sugar and have a blood glucose of say 5.8 after 2hrs would it be unlikely I have diabetes?
Not necessarily it depends on what carbs, and was the 5.8 accurate. You don't get diagnosed with a finger prick test because it is just a rough snapshot of your level in that one moment. I say rough because our meters are only accurate to +/-15%.So if I were to have a starting blood glucose of 5.5 before eating, then eat a meal high in carbs and sugar and have a blood glucose of say 5.8 after 2hrs would it be unlikely I have diabetes?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?