but my new consultant thinks I am using the other eye which I can't be as it is covered during the test and I shut my other eye anyway.
The left eye has a bleed every so many months but tends to clear within 6 weeks. The bleed means that a white cloud obscures my vision and occasionally I get black tendrils and shooting dark spots.
Nothing is being done to allay my fears and i don't feel as though i can ask them any more questions as i sense a feeling of " not another indecisive patient"
I am told that the reason the left eye keeps bleeding is because one of the new vessels has grown into the vitreous humour creating a bridge but this new vessel is weak in comparison and as such, each time the vitreous moves, it moves and stretches this weak bridge which breaks and then bleeds.
Well, you sound like you have a very good perspective on it all and will make as good a choice as anyone can. Good luck and, yes, please keep us informed of how you get on.Hi noblehead and Dark Horse,
Thanks to you both for responding and for the links.
I am told that the reason the left eye keeps bleeding is because one of the new vessels has grown into the vitreous humour creating a bridge but this new vessel is weak in comparison and as such, each time the vitreous moves, it moves and stretches this weak bridge which breaks and then bleeds.
Since the beginning of this year , I have had one what I call major and 2 minor bleeds and as of this moment I have a tendril which shoots all over the top part of my view as I move my eye but otherwise clear vision. That said it is easy to forget how annoying it is when it first bleeds, when your sight is restored.
The hesitancy comes from firstly how the initial surgeon responded ie as a surgeon you always like to get the practice, secondly that on referral I was told that due to how good my sight still is when clear, they wouldn't consider a vitrectomy to then finally have a third surgeon tell me that they will put me in for a vitrectomy but if I am unsure then to delay which suggests that the operation is not urgent vis a vis it being vision saving!
It's difficult to perceive what the surgeons goals are: do they just want the practice or is it in my best interest to have the surgery? I asked my recent surgeon how many vitrectomies they had performed and the response was that they stopped counting once they reached a thousand which was hard to stomach as they are very young and as I subsequently checked, have only been licensed since 2009! They never give a straight answer and this coupled with the stories I then come across have left me not knowing what is in my best interest!
I have also had poor experience in the last 5 years with surgery and this also adds to my trepidation.
That said I have been looking at something called micromort and to be honest I'm now at the stage I think that if it is going to go wrong, it goes wrong. If there is the chance that it long term eradicates the bleeds but worsens my visual acuity, I get a new prescription. If my field of vision is affected to the extent that I can't drive, my rationalisation is that I haven't driven since September of last year and at the end of the day in 5 years or so we'll all be in cars that are driven by a computer program anyways! If the worse happens and I do lose sight in my left eye permanently, well millions of people lose their sight and worse and still manage to function as human beings.
Thanks again though and I shall keep you informed
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?