Jamie H
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 126
Get you now.I assumed the comment was about the 3.5 times more likely to die statistic but maybe not.
With regards to shielding, It was being widely reported a few days ago when the OP started this thread. I heard it on the radio news.
https://www-mirror-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/diabetics-need-shield-home-against-22080905.amp?amp_js_v=a3&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA=#aoh=15911635819405&referrer=https://www.google.com&_tf=From %1$s&share=https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/diabetics-need-shield-home-against-22080905
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.te...-isolate-home-lockdown-lifted-government/amp/
It was reported in newspapers it was being discussed. It does not say anywhere that scientists are or were reccomending a blanket approach to shield all those with diabetes. A very subtle difference in my opinion. I've read on numerous platforms that many are not suggesting a blanket approach as it doesn't tie in with the results of the study done by partha kar and colleagues etc