I would still like to know your thoughts on how to steer the boat forward using empirical data. What levels would you use (protein, carbs, calories, total glucose, calories, HbA1c, insulin, blood sugar) and what would be your optimal targets to trim the sails?
I think we still lack a lot of the empirical data to generate the levels.
The likes of Trudi Deakin recommend 80/15/5 ( I think it was) fat/protein/carbs. I myself am eating 45/45/10. But then we fall into the questions that tie all these together. What are the optimum levels of F/P/C as part of calorie intake? What is optimum calorifically? Before we even ask this question, bg level and hba1c target levels need to be broached.
From my perspective, I would suggest that regularly tested bg levels should be such that the hba1c shows in the "normal" range of 4.5%-6%. This should mean a non-spiking, non-hypoing bg range of 4-7mmol/l.
If that is the target then how do we get there? Fuel and insulin have to be optimised to reach these targets. Either as a non-diabetic/pre-diabetic by changing diet or as a diabetic by managing diet and insulin.
While we focus on an LC approach there are a lot of active t1s that focus on a low fat approach and have seen massive insulin sensitivity as a result. The key thing they don't eat is processed foods and refined carbs.
Similarly, the LC approach has a key aspect in that most of the foods that are used are whole foods and non-processed.
I am starting to wonder whether this is a more important aspect of diet than specifically LC or LF.
Again, empirical data is hard to come by and what may be required is to supply proponents of all diet types with cgm of some kind and ask them to keep a week of diet and exercise data along with the records. If you can do this among a large enough sample size of enough of a variety of people, you may have a better picture from which to draw observational conclusions.