- Messages
- 11,338
- Type of diabetes
- I reversed my Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
Just to be clear - The ND came from the study.
http://www.ncl.ac.uk/magres/research/diabetes/reversal.htm
This link also contains handouts for your Doctor.
This study was time bound - hence the 56 days. The study was attempting to replicate bariatric surgery. The message is clear;
A crucial point is that individuals have different levels of tolerance of fat within liver and pancreas. Only when a person has more fat than they can cope with does type 2 diabetes develop. In other words, once a person crosses their personal fat threshold, type 2 diabetes develops. Once they successfully lose weight and go below their personal fat threshold, diabetes will disappear.
My point about time frames is two fold. 1 - the ND (coming from the study) is a controlled time frame. and 2. Time frames can create an advantage for people (like me) who need a structure to work within.
Hope this clarifies things - and good luck with reversing T2 - tell us how you get on.
I know I'm being completely pedantic here, but I need to say that, in my view, T2 is a portfolio disease. In other words, it ng label, describing a condition developing a number of ways, due to a number of causes. Whilst I largely agree with your statement about PFTs, I feel a bit concerned about the definitive statement you make; "....Only when a person has more fat than they can cope with does type 2 diabetes develop...."
For those on Professor Taylor's, this mainly held true, but not for everyone. For some people, reducing their body fat will not result in breaching any PFT, as that probably isn't the reason they, personally, became diabetic.
I think the ND gives T2s; particularly those carrying extra poundage, great hope for a positive impact (I'm deliberately not going to use reversal, cure or remission here, or we'll be having a whole different debate), but it won't work for everyone. I'm not suggesting anyone here has given the impression that the ND is the silver bullet solution to T2, but I do think any messaging about the efficacy of the ND (or any other approach) should include the guard that it doesn't achieve the most positive outcome for everyone.