Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Weight Loss and Dieting
Diabeties v fibre
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Beating-My-Betes" data-source="post: 2386193" data-attributes="member: 532959"><p>The issue for me is that you're starting from a premise that I don't think has a foundation either in current-day science, nor in evolutionary science. Not that I believe science is the final arbiter of everything. But rather than starting from a position that a zero-carb (Carnivore, I guess) diet is the default position, and therefor efibre 'must' be unnecessary, that perhaps it is the necessity of fibre (at least in some quantity) that undermines the position of carnivory.</p><p></p><p>Just as with vegansim, the carnivore diet is only something that can be sustained due to our current systems and affluence. We don't have to worry about running out of stored fat 'cause we can buy it everywhere. I don't believe early humans had the kind of 'luxury' to turn down whatever food they found, whether fruit, starches, meat or tree-bark <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p><strong><em><u>Edited</u></em></strong>: for grammar and spelling</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Beating-My-Betes, post: 2386193, member: 532959"] The issue for me is that you're starting from a premise that I don't think has a foundation either in current-day science, nor in evolutionary science. Not that I believe science is the final arbiter of everything. But rather than starting from a position that a zero-carb (Carnivore, I guess) diet is the default position, and therefor efibre 'must' be unnecessary, that perhaps it is the necessity of fibre (at least in some quantity) that undermines the position of carnivory. Just as with vegansim, the carnivore diet is only something that can be sustained due to our current systems and affluence. We don't have to worry about running out of stored fat 'cause we can buy it everywhere. I don't believe early humans had the kind of 'luxury' to turn down whatever food they found, whether fruit, starches, meat or tree-bark ;) [B][I][U]Edited[/U][/I][/B]: for grammar and spelling [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Weight Loss and Dieting
Diabeties v fibre
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…