I would absolutely agree that type 1.5 is type 1. In fact, I think the "Type 1.5" diagnosis should be eliminated until better standards are created to better define the disease.Hi. I agree with most of @TorqPenderloins post but would claim that LADA T1.5 is T1. Even T1 shortly after birth has a timescale (very short) to having no insulin. As you age T1 may come on more slowly and be called T1.5 but it's no different from T1. It's due to islet cell destruction and insulin will be needed after tablets. My LADA took around 10 years to come from no-where to needing insulin.
The problem continues to be that many people with type 1.5 are treated similar to a patient with type 2 and are often prescribed only oral medications that can potentially accelerate the process of losing all natural insulin production.
Hi again. I followed exactly the route you describe and my diabetes GP refused me insulin initially. She had never heard of Late onset T1 and was surprised when I told her my nephew ended-up with DKA at age 22 i.e. LADA. In the UK diabetes training for GPs is very narrow.I would absolutely agree that type 1.5 is type 1. In fact, I think the "Type 1.5" diagnosis should be eliminated until better standards are created to better define the disease.
The problem continues to be that many people with type 1.5 are treated similar to a patient with type 2 and are often prescribed only oral medications that can potentially accelerate the process of losing all natural insulin production.
I personally believe people with type 1.5 should be treated similar to a type 1 patient (if not identically) and should start intensive insulin therapy as soon as it becomes necessary to regulate blood glucose levels. The worst thing I've seen happen is that people are prescribed Metformin and/or a sulfonylurea (like Gliclazide) and they're forced to keep their levels in the 8+ range because their doctor won't prescribe them insulin. While 8mmol/l may not have a HIGH likelihood of leading to permanent complications, it is certainly possible and it's a choice people should be able to make themselves rather than be forced.
In short, I agree with you.
/End rant
I don't know if it's necessarily your GP's fault (although I understand where you're coming from). Remember that she has to know how to treat and diagnose much more than just our endocrine system. Type 1.5 may be more common than we think, but it's still very rare in comparison to many other diseases.Hi again. I followed exactly the route you describe and my diabetes GP refused me insulin initially. She had never heard of Late onset T1 and was surprised when I told her my nephew ended-up with DKA at age 22 i.e. LADA. In the UK diabetes training for GPs is very narrow.
Polly, Your original Q. It's correct that the difference is autoimmune islet cell destruction, but that's only half the answer. T 2 is the result of insulin resistance - of chronically raised circulating insulin because the body's insulin receptors have been desensitised. It's what happens after that has been going on for many years - the final result of hyperinsulinemia. That's why the best treatment is not forcing BG levels down, but lowering insulin resistance. (Which no drug can do, but carb restriction and/or intermittent fasting can. Which is why the Newcastle Diet works and can put Type 2 into remission.)This probably sounds silly but forgot to ask what the difference is between type 2 and Lada I am a newbie and learning every day off this website
To clarify: Type 2 isn't the same as insulin resistance, bit it's caused by insulin resistance. It's the final stage of hyperinsulinemia. It's the *result* of insulin resistance.To say that T2 is insulin resistance isn't exactly true. A lot of people, diabetic or not, have insulin resistance. T2 is a large group of different kinds of non-autoimmune diabetes varieties, mainly poly-genetic.
As to T2 and LADA they seem to share a lot of the diabetic genes but in LADA you also get antibodies, at least sometimes.