AloeSvea
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,092
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Other
Just popping in with my oft repeated reminder (sorry if I am boring you all) that the ND diet and defattifying the liver does not automatically have the desired effect on everyone.
I do not have a fatty liver, have v low triglycerides, and have had impaired glucose tolerance since I was a child, and type 2 for probably the last 4-5 years. Ish. The ND would never get me below my personal fat threshold, even if that was the problem, because my PFT is probably about 3 stone! Yes, that was a joke.
The ND is fab when it works, but professor Taylor himself states that aggressive weight loss is NOT necessary for the benefits to show. Any diet that suits the patient that results in sufficient weight loss will achieve the goal - provided their type 2 is attributable to fatty liver/being above the personal fat threshold.
I just have visions of people who will never benefit from this launching into it without proper understanding, potentially mucking up their metabolism by turning on their 'thrifty gene', and causing themselves further yoyo weight struggles further down the line.
Brunneria - I am VERY pleased you talk about this. I have paid attention I promise.
I have also read some info recently about the effect of VLCDs on women in particular. And I have become very interested in this (and need to give a message about it to Arab Horse...). It seems women are more resistant to having dramatic effects from VLCDs, and from dieting generally, which makes total sense when considering women's special role in carrying and giving birth to humanity. (We women have another level of fat retention or a bigger buffer zone if you like, that men don't have, is the theory posited, in order to have extra fat stores for pregnancy and breast feeding - very energy intensive activities.) It made total sense to me, when I read it. Doesn't mean a VLCD doesn't have an effect on us - just that it is much harder, especially when of potentially reproductive age. (ie younger women.) Something to consider indeed, when wondering about whether to VLCD/ND or not. (I am no longer potentially reproductive.)
I too, believe my Personal Fat Threshold is quite low. My mother is pre-diabetic now, and she only weighs 54 kg. My God! I cannot imagine being that weight now. So I relate to the three stone joke! (And I can't imagine doing a semi-starvation diet again any time soon, or even in the distant future!) (No, no, no!). And yes, good for folk to have a gander at Richard Doughty and his experience, when considering the range of PFTs.
I hear you re the fatty liver stipulation. I assumed my liver was fatty, due to my former big belly. It was a pretty safe assumption . (My diabetes nurse whipped a measuring tape out and measured around my waist before giving me a definite nod in the affirmative on the ND.) But I am very pleased Arab Horse's doctor was making her be tested for it, as she is very slender already. Very very wise and emphasises the reason for medical supervision, or at the very least, an initial consultation with medical professionals. Quite right.