jay hay-char
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,683
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
Just been looking at this. I am wholly in favour of honours being awarded to deserving people who serve their communities, or who do something extraordinary but the habit of handing out honours to people for being famous, or for making substantial donations to political parties devalues their worth in my view.
This year's particularly egregious example is the knighthood awarded to Ken Dodd. Here is a man who narrowly escaped being convicted of tax evasion, and who should have gone to prison, in my view. We become more and more of a banana republic every time something like this happens, and the value of the honours awarded to people who truly deserve them is cheapened by each such event.
Yes, yes: he's a national treasure and I'm sure lots of people on here will disagree with me, but the man is a crook. Does he really deserve a knighthood?
This year's particularly egregious example is the knighthood awarded to Ken Dodd. Here is a man who narrowly escaped being convicted of tax evasion, and who should have gone to prison, in my view. We become more and more of a banana republic every time something like this happens, and the value of the honours awarded to people who truly deserve them is cheapened by each such event.
Yes, yes: he's a national treasure and I'm sure lots of people on here will disagree with me, but the man is a crook. Does he really deserve a knighthood?
Last edited: