• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Reversal of diabetes

julifriend said:
Personally I think the term 'reversed' can be very misleading. In most of the examples quoted, the person has not gone back to eating what they did before diagnosis. Only if they did that and showed no diabetic symptoms could they be said to have 'reversed' their diabetes. As most have significantly modified their diet by removing carbs and sugars then they really should be classed as well controlled.

There's a graph of blood glucose levels over time in one of the earlier posts showing what happened when the poster ate a breakfast similar to that which they'd have had prior to diagnosis. The poster said they'd reversed their diabetes yet the graph shows a diabetic response to the food. They're obviously well controlled with their current diet, but they've not reversed their diabetes as the graph clearly demonstrates.
Click to expand...
Not seen anything to disprove what you say at all.
 
Yes . obviously it does. Are you saying if you believe something other people don't matter?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No. are you saying you do? You said "does it matter what results others get then?"
 
Bear in mind I am one of two or three who have been pronounced cured. (but am not)
 
No reason at all. Unless you didn't think they were telling the truth?
 
daddys1 said:
Maybe I just don't understand, they must have had reason's for doing so, and you must have reasons for saying your not, are you still in the diabetic range then, don't see any numbers on your profile.
Neil
Click to expand...
It is a long story mate. I am diabetic but nhs cant measure it.
 
Back
Top