Search Results

Not for much longer. Bleaching is killing the reefs.

By not knowingly I mean that I would not eat a food after being told it had bug powder in it. And besides, there is nothing in that picture that I would eat, my saying was 'no orange food from orange boxes'. Perhaps I should have said red.

Note to self: Never mention the fact that your all time favourite bread product was home made choc-chip Brioche (yeah, the bread that thinks it is a cake!). Good job it was a faff to make so that it was rarely made - dodged a bullet there... Oh... wait...

Risk to Benefit, folks. Cheaper and easier just to fast or do some IF and you get the benefit of developing better eating habits overall.

I keep getting targetted by Christian evangelists because I once viewed a Dawkins video. It makes no sense. I left FB a few years ago, it just got daft.

Just more targetted advertising if you ask me. Mind you, I have seen toddlers use tech... sometimes better than I can!

Cui bono? The health industry. that's who. And besides the spying nature of this I am an atheist so would not use the terms God and Pray and yet...

So you perceive a negative glycaemic affect and hypothesise that it may be the amount of caffeine in your diet but are unwilling to perform the simplest of tests (elimination) to test your hypothesis. You, instead, use cgm and test strips though you have not been diagnosed with RH or Diabetes...

Omitting caffeine in any form will therefore test your hypothesis.

Hello aand welcome. Do you mean make up or do you mean tattoo.

Not Knowingly.

I am not dismissing Taylor. I am, however, dismissing people like Rory Collins. You cannot serve us well by defending all science as well researched, unbiased and without monetary interests. Where science is now failing us, all the n=1s, is that some science is becoming Big Business and...

Ah, yes. Note to self: Read the OP properly!

It's not so much gng, it is the simple fact that carbs are converted to glucose immediately. Was this HCP off sick when that lecture was given? Not that it takes a whole lecture to learn that one process.

It is nice that you have a choice.

Do the links give any indication of the oxalate or lectin values in Kale?

It is disrespectful to assume that n=1 is meaningless. Too many guidelines are and have been set using dodgy hypotheses and equally dodgy correlative epidemiology. I have oft said on this forum that the aging process alone is going to change or might change the outcomes of my methods of...

And it is? I await your response with not a little trepidation...

One could hypothesise that that a preponderous number of coat hangers in your wardrobe strongly correlates with astigmatism but it will never prove (on its own) causation and the operative word you use is 'hypothesis'. I misunderstood nowt. We have in the past here on the forum pondered why no...

Way Hey! Congratulations and well done.