• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

2nd A1c results

popps

Well-Known Member
Messages
88
Hello all,

I received the second A1c results from my GP today via the telephone. This is six months since my first A1c and a year since original diagnosis.

First A1c = 5%; second A1c = 5.2%, both on exercise and diet alone.

Although I'm pleased to have achieved an A1c within the "non-diabetic range" I'm a bit concerned about the slight increase. Does anyone know whether this is indicative of a downward trend or can such results fluctuate from one test to another?

Also, the doc's not too pleased with my total cholesterol result, which is 5.5 (history = 6.3, 5.8, 5.2, 5.5) and he suggests statins, although the possible side effects I've read about worries me.

All-in all then I'm pleased with the results - blood sugars OK, kidney and liver function OK, cholesterol too high but I still feel I'm essentially in control of most things thanks to a reduction in carbs and an exercise regime. Thanks to all who've offered me advice in the past.
 
An increase of that size 9is pretty much zero
Don't worry!
You're doing it right.
Could you have been a little less strict with the diet occasionally? now you know what you're doing
 
Hana,

Thanks for the reply. I'm going on holiday for two weeks soon, so maybe I'll give myself a bit of a break diet-wise. When I was first diagnosed at the end of May last year I received the news the afternoon before I was due to fly out which cast a damper on the whole thing. How things have changed in a year ...
 
Hi Popps,did the doctor give you the results of your cholesterol test at all? There are 4 parts to it.Total cholesterol.HDL which is the 'good' stuff,LDL which is the 'bad'stuff and Trigs which can show an elevated risk of heart disease.It is possible to have a high cholesterol reading but still be good if the HDL is quite high but the trigs and LDL are low.
 
Hi Popps - It's good to meet you.

Those HbA1c results are great! Just fine! What is now important is that you work at keeping them at that level. Mine were at that level for around seven years before they rose to 9.5%. At that stage, I started taking action to self-manage my blood glucose levels by testing. I'm now back down to 5.5% and still working at it.

Keep up the good work.

Best Wishes - John
 
Brilliant!

Yes IMO well within the range of experimental error and only to be considered if there's an increasing trend.

As Sue says the important information on your lipids is concealed by the total number, for all you know you could have spectacularly high HDL which would be good and not in need of treatment.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…