Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
An interesting article on types.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaylee" data-source="post: 2227322" data-attributes="member: 101136"><p>Fascinating article.. Though. Unless I've read this quoted below wrong?</p><p></p><p>A majority of T2s diagnosed may not even exceed the "7.5%" A1c to start with?</p><p>Lol, unlike the "rocketeer" of discovering the world of T1 & maintaining stability..</p><p></p><p>& isn't the ideal target range these days 6.5%?</p><p></p><p><strong>"If one looks at outcomes, the proportion of the Type 2 diabetes population achieving HbA1c<7.5% stands at <a href="https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/clinical-audits-and-registries/national-diabetes-audit" target="_blank">nearly 66%.</a> This is testament to the work done by primary care. It is also an outcome which other countries would struggle to achieve – especially when one factors in added issues such as frailty, multi-morbidity – where higher HbA1c would be clinically appropriate.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>However, when one looks at Type 1 Diabetes, <a href="https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/clinical-audits-and-registries/national-diabetes-audit" target="_blank">the achievement is around 30%</a>which reflects not only the different pathophysiology, but also the need to clarify to all concerned the need to improve outcomes in this group whose pathology, treatment and care can all be fundamentally different."</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaylee, post: 2227322, member: 101136"] Fascinating article.. Though. Unless I've read this quoted below wrong? A majority of T2s diagnosed may not even exceed the "7.5%" A1c to start with? Lol, unlike the "rocketeer" of discovering the world of T1 & maintaining stability.. & isn't the ideal target range these days 6.5%? [B]"If one looks at outcomes, the proportion of the Type 2 diabetes population achieving HbA1c<7.5% stands at [URL='https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/clinical-audits-and-registries/national-diabetes-audit']nearly 66%.[/URL] This is testament to the work done by primary care. It is also an outcome which other countries would struggle to achieve – especially when one factors in added issues such as frailty, multi-morbidity – where higher HbA1c would be clinically appropriate. However, when one looks at Type 1 Diabetes, [URL='https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/clinical-audits-and-registries/national-diabetes-audit']the achievement is around 30%[/URL]which reflects not only the different pathophysiology, but also the need to clarify to all concerned the need to improve outcomes in this group whose pathology, treatment and care can all be fundamentally different."[/B] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
An interesting article on types.
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…