The 80% cut in animal meat consumption was determined by the WHO via the IPCC and all member states are tasked with meeting this target by 2050 to meet the Paris Agreement. USA is exempt since they withdrew from that accord. What we are discussing in this thread is mainly UK.Can you just clarify this point for me please?
Is the massive reduction in animal protein availability only the UK? If not, what other countries are also affected?
Also, given that the average age of farmers in Wales is over 60 years old, and only 3% are under 35 years old, closing farms upon retirement in the next 7 years is going to be easy for government. Most of them are tenant farmers.
From one cynic to another - The House of Lords did raise this during the Farmng Bill debate, and although not included in that bill, a formal request was made to the DEFRA Representative to include suitable protection into the Agriculture bill which has its first reading in the Commons next week. We will need to see if it gets included. However, it may go into the forthcoming Food Bill instead. Or the Land Use Bill. Or none of them, and await individual trade agreements to be sorted.Cynic warning: as the US is exempt, could this be paving the way for importing meat and dairy products from them, as our own production decreases?
Vegans want simple solutions and its not that simple. Many of us are alive due to animal testing or byproducts of animals used in treatments.
To live very simply and remain in good health you need a bit of grazing and for most of the world, a dairy animal and perhaps a few chickens. Its been a succesful method of survival for thousands of years, the modern vegan animal activist could not survive if they did not live in a first world country with access to large amounts of imported food and synthetic vitamins. Its the end of winter, and you would be lucky if apart from potatoes, carrots, swede,winter green and leeks, there would be little else to eat, oh and stored fruit. How do you stop people keeping chickens and eating eggs, how do you stop someone keeping a pig and slaughtering for home use? A new black market?
The only bright spot on the whole Brexit thing for me is if there is a food import hiccup in the system will show how dependant we are on food imports. Every time I eat an almond I think about the water its cost to produce it, lots
https://www.businessinsider.com/amo...row-one-almond-orange-tomato-2015-4?r=US&IR=T
Even the USA is getting worried.
I know how much my cows drink, but as a resource that I pay for I would rather spend it on them than a daily bath like my neighbour. To make my heavy clay land viable for any crop would probabely take four years manure laid on thick, and then a lot of crops would be lost with winter water, other farmers have tried and failed.
I like to think we are coming to the creast of a hill, the hill is made up of all the progress and choice that we have since the 1960's, which we have made a mound of paperwork( 40 years of working in the NHS makes me dispair that action has been replaced by paper, or the blasted putor) and rubbish, from having what we want when we want, thinking we can have it all with no cost. When we reach the top we top and every one will see there could be a cliff the otherside and we have to turn back, if its possible.
Seitan has been part of the diet in South East Asia for centuries but only went into commercial production in 1962. Similarly tofu and tempeh are also sources of amino acids that have been traditionally available in SE Asia. I fully understand the process and production costs of other new foods such as Quorn and have no intention of insulting anyone when I suggest that we may have to embrace eating less meat and related animal products in the future.Seitan was only invented in 1961and is a wheat gluten byproduct. It is an allrgenic food source. It is considered to be a macrobiotic diet component, but has recently been adopted by vegans as a bacon substitute. It is not considered to be an effective source of protein since it is wheat based.
Quorn we know and marmite over. it does not replace the animal amino acids, and is vitamin deficient too.
Tofu is classed as a complete protein, but that is not the same as being a complete food. It has the 9 essential B vitamins, but not much else. The source is soy, which contains cyanobacteria and phytols that many find difficult to eat. The Tofu is fermented that does alleviate some of this adverse effect, so it is more acceptable and safer than pure soya. Originally used in asian communities it forms part of their diet, but is not usually the prime source for protein.and in China and Japan the usual source of protein is Pork or fish. The same is apparently true of Okinawians, who also used a pork heavy diet, but who are currently being lauded as beingvegan only, which is incorrect. Similarly hindu monks are claimed to be vegans, but in fact have been demonstrated to being onmivores in a recent BBC documentary.
I don't disagree with you but could we please be mindful that this topic isn't supposed to be about vegans per se. You make many valid points and I appreciate that it's a natural fork in the road of discussions of this nature, but whenever we go down that path the threads tend to attract cluster-spamming that leads to the topics being closed and the conversation shut-down. Then future updates are impossible, leading contributors to open new threads that then attract yet more complaints. Rinse & repeat.
The word was coined in the 60s (ready for export to other countries) but the product had been consumed for centuries prior in Japan and China.Seitan was only invented in 1961and is a wheat gluten byproduct. It is an allrgenic food source. It is considered to be a macrobiotic diet component, but has recently been adopted by vegans as a bacon substitute. It is not considered to be an effective source of protein since it is wheat based.
If Tesla were selling 100 cars a month then it might be significant. Remember it is only the diet that we are expecting to change, PETA have their own agenda. Most cars have synthetic covers such as leatherette.Related to the future availability of meat products, in an article in this week’s Autocar referring to leather seats, under pressure from PETA, Tesla do not sell cars with animal products in them. PETA apparently have shares in Tesla. Other manufacturers are following suit. Mercedes are looking for alternatives to leather (their star F1 driver is Lewis Hamilton, an outspoken Vegan). As indeed are other car manufacturers.
If this outlet for a byproduct of meat consumption is not taken up, then meat will be more expensive, there will be more waste, or farmers will be no longer afford to raise cattle.
And our choice to eat meat will disappear by default.
I supect the quality of seitan nowadays is inferior to what it used to be, especially now that modern wheat grains have replaced the traditional ones. I see seitan is actually quite low in protein in terms of RDI, and does not offer a complete protein solution, I cannot find how it fares on vitamins, but so far it is more akin to Playdoh than meat. Has quite a high copper content which may be worrisome to some, as is the selenium content. Often it is highly processed for modern sales outlets, and has high salt content. Because it is wheat gluten, it should not be eaten by anyone with a gluten intolerance, or anyone who may be suffering from leaky gut symdrome. Trials have shown it can trigger leaky gut syndrome in persons not previously prone to it.The word was coined in the 60s (ready for export to other countries) but the product had been consumed for centuries prior in Japan and China.
I think that Tesla Model 3 is one of the best selling cars currently, so it is quite significant. That and the other premium car makers also looking for alternatives to leather. I think it shows the many fronts in which the militant anti meat eaters are attacking our way of eating.If Tesla were selling 100 cars a month then it might be significant. Remember it is only the diet that we are expecting to change, PETA have their own agenda. Most cars have synthetic covers such as leatherette.
In 2019 Tesla sold 367,500 vehicles but I doubt the use of leather in car seats has significant effect on the total number of cattle.If Tesla were selling 100 cars a month then it might be significant
Really? Whilst there may be some truth in what you say, what if you are wrong and man is a significant factor. Can we afford to take the chance? That said let’s focus on the real issues (Industry, overpopulation to name but two) not the fashionable ones (veganism)
If I could get past your visa system I would join you in a shot, bush fires included for a plentiful supply of beef and lamb.We have plenty of room to live in, if you are tough enough to live in the bush.
Australia exports a lot of live cattle, sheep from country that is basically desert, similar to the pix below of cattle on a muster.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?