Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Food, Nutrition and Recipes
And so it begins: Eat less meat or we’ll make you.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 2206198" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>The biggest source of atmospheric methane is rotting plants All hydrocarbons oxidise to either CO2 (aerobic) or Methane (Anaerobic), not just grass. the important thing is that humans cannot eat grass, shrubs or trees.</p><p> The earth did a very good job at sequestering carbon in the form of underground hydrocarbons (fossil fuels) which we are using up at a prodigious rate, and it is this activity that is causing the excess GHG. Burning biomass does not help and growing biomass to burn is not helpful. Unless we use natural sources for generating our energy either solar or wind or wave or gravity then we are just treading water and not replenishing the carbon store. </p><p></p><p>One source of fuel that is planet friendly is hydrogen, but it is not easy to capture, store, or transport, But when burnt it only produces heat and water. vapour so is zero carbon emissive, but not zero carbon footprint to generate unless using electrochemical means such as hydrolysis from solar energy. This is what we should be working on to save the planet. Note that a useful bi-product of electrolysis is oxygen So fuel for the car, fuel for me, win, win. Hydrogen fuel cells are reusable and recyclable, but lithium batteries must be replaced and have a short lifespan. Wind turbines have a useful life of about 10 years, then they must be scrapped and replaced. These technoogies have a large carbon footprint and ongoing maintenance expense. What is the carbon footprint of an electric car nowadays. I note this subject is never discussed in the press or media.</p><p></p><p>We need to turn the focus away from cow farts and extinction rebellion causing extinction, to solving and supporting relevant technological solutions. I watch Euronews simply because their Futuris program every day covers these technologies, and is not filled up with games and mobile phone apps.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 2206198, member: 196898"] The biggest source of atmospheric methane is rotting plants All hydrocarbons oxidise to either CO2 (aerobic) or Methane (Anaerobic), not just grass. the important thing is that humans cannot eat grass, shrubs or trees. The earth did a very good job at sequestering carbon in the form of underground hydrocarbons (fossil fuels) which we are using up at a prodigious rate, and it is this activity that is causing the excess GHG. Burning biomass does not help and growing biomass to burn is not helpful. Unless we use natural sources for generating our energy either solar or wind or wave or gravity then we are just treading water and not replenishing the carbon store. One source of fuel that is planet friendly is hydrogen, but it is not easy to capture, store, or transport, But when burnt it only produces heat and water. vapour so is zero carbon emissive, but not zero carbon footprint to generate unless using electrochemical means such as hydrolysis from solar energy. This is what we should be working on to save the planet. Note that a useful bi-product of electrolysis is oxygen So fuel for the car, fuel for me, win, win. Hydrogen fuel cells are reusable and recyclable, but lithium batteries must be replaced and have a short lifespan. Wind turbines have a useful life of about 10 years, then they must be scrapped and replaced. These technoogies have a large carbon footprint and ongoing maintenance expense. What is the carbon footprint of an electric car nowadays. I note this subject is never discussed in the press or media. We need to turn the focus away from cow farts and extinction rebellion causing extinction, to solving and supporting relevant technological solutions. I watch Euronews simply because their Futuris program every day covers these technologies, and is not filled up with games and mobile phone apps. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Food, Nutrition and Recipes
And so it begins: Eat less meat or we’ll make you.
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…