Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Newly Diagnosed
angiogram results are in
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheBigNewt" data-source="post: 1650674" data-attributes="member: 380756"><p>The so-called "calcium score" CT scan is only of value if you have ZERO calcium. Then it's very unlikely you have any coronary disease, if that's you I wouldn't take a statin. But it's rare to have zero calcium especially if you're older. On the opposite end of the spectrum is someone with "established coronary disease" which includes anyone who's had a coronary stent or a heart attack or bypass surgery or an angiogram with, say, a 50% lesion. Statins have shown their most benefit in these patients, and high dose statins like Lipitor 80mg at that. For Type 1 diabetics I think they are not proven in primary prevention (before you have established disease). There are too few Type 1's to enroll in a primary prevention trial. Type 2's are different, they tend to get "macrovascular" disease (coronary, cerebral vascular/stroke, peripheral vascular disease in legs/feet). We Type 1's tend to get "microvascular" disease (eyes, kidneys). Statins are not a big deal for that, better blood sugar control is. High blood pressure's major risk is a stroke, not coronary disease. Coronary disease's major risk are lipids. And the risk of a smoker having a cardiac "event" drops to that of a non smoker within a year of quitting. Just my .02.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheBigNewt, post: 1650674, member: 380756"] The so-called "calcium score" CT scan is only of value if you have ZERO calcium. Then it's very unlikely you have any coronary disease, if that's you I wouldn't take a statin. But it's rare to have zero calcium especially if you're older. On the opposite end of the spectrum is someone with "established coronary disease" which includes anyone who's had a coronary stent or a heart attack or bypass surgery or an angiogram with, say, a 50% lesion. Statins have shown their most benefit in these patients, and high dose statins like Lipitor 80mg at that. For Type 1 diabetics I think they are not proven in primary prevention (before you have established disease). There are too few Type 1's to enroll in a primary prevention trial. Type 2's are different, they tend to get "macrovascular" disease (coronary, cerebral vascular/stroke, peripheral vascular disease in legs/feet). We Type 1's tend to get "microvascular" disease (eyes, kidneys). Statins are not a big deal for that, better blood sugar control is. High blood pressure's major risk is a stroke, not coronary disease. Coronary disease's major risk are lipids. And the risk of a smoker having a cardiac "event" drops to that of a non smoker within a year of quitting. Just my .02. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Newly Diagnosed
angiogram results are in
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…