• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Article in today's Times


What adjustments to you make for stress and ambient temperature? How do you quantify them?

Dillinger
 

Problem Roy,

Portraying diabetes in simple terms people see it in simple terms, so we never move forward and constantly stuck with the 'One Mantra, One Regime' Fits All.. And to give this simple version incorrectly compounds matters even more!

You see the currant 'dietary mantra' as wrong based on that it doesn't work well for you as an individual...

But you are forgetting that I and others aren't you, others such as myself, may not need, want or various reasons can't do as you do, so for us your 'mantra' wouldn't work..

So replacing one mantra with another one, isn't the answer at all and does actually lack benefits and impacts elsewhere...

We need to get people to recognise that we need many different 'mantra' so individual need, wants etc are catered for..

And the only way to find out what somebody's needs are, is by using Test Strips! Bingo a very much better argument to why Test Strips need to be given to T2's...

After All, we all succeed with more success when we are doing something by choice rather than being enforced to do something..

That is something I've learn't as a diabetic...

When I first was diagnosed, it was a case Carbs and Insulin were prescribed to you, you ate regularly at the same times of the day, everyday... Up at 7am everyday for my first injection, breakfast was at 7.30am had to take into considerations playschool runs in the week! You then had to eat the prescribed carb amount otherwise you would suffer a hypo... It was pretty much a miserable existence really, now I have total control eat when I want, what I want, go to bed and get up when I want... Because I have the knowledge and understanding plus the kit, to enable me to make some very basic decisions in my life...

So we need to impress on others the complexities and the need to have fundamental choices along side the necessary kit... That way more people will succeed with a lot more success than now..

The reality, is that there will never be a time where a level of control safeguards all or prevent long term complications for all, purely because the human race is pretty fickle in ways, so there will always be, those who can't or won't for various reasons, do what's required to maintain control, whether a single mantra or multi mantra regime is promoted!

All we can do, is go with a multi-regime approach, so we limit complications etc for as many people as possible.
 
I am deeply sorry Grazer, but in my creative mode, I must have gotten confused, not hard these day's for me. I am glad you have not taken offence, an excellent simple description, and I shall let Borofergie answer your comments himself :wink: :wink:
 
Thank you Roy :lol: . And well done on at least trying to help things by writing to someone! Your point was well made. "Keep it simple" is the Mantra when explaining things to a lay person.
 

As you know with purely by knowledge gained by experience!

I use less insulin in winter months than I do summer, if the temperature rises in the summer I need to increase my pump TBR (Temp basal rate) by 10-20%

You use the experience gained from previous adjustments form the same/similar situation and make an educated guess!
 
Jopar,
Fine you email your MP and mantra him/her to death, I will email mine. At least I am being proactive and voicing MY concerns with MY MP. When and if they begin to listen, I'm sure you will have the opportunity to voice your mantra's and get them out in the open.
 
jopar said:
All we can do, is go with a multi-regime approach, so we limit complications etc for as many people as possible.

That's a good statement as effectively I interpret it as the same as "Eat to your meter" i.e. people do what's required to keep themselves complication free. The only issue is, in my opinion, when DUK, the NHS or individuals attempt to limit those choices and effectively rule out a good fraction of the regimes in what you describe as a multi-regime approach.

The obvious issue is when someone like myself finds that to be complication free we need to drastically restrict our carbohydrate intakes then it would appear that is not one of the regimes we are allowed to choose. To me it's that single issue which is at the root of all of the debate and certainly not that a multi-regime approach is somehow invalid. Personally as an advocate of "Eat to your meter" then I support any method, including non low carb ones, that keep people safe. I just wish DUK, the NHS and others would allow me the same choice.
 
jopar said:
I use less insulin in winter months than I do summer, if the temperature rises in the summer I need to increase my pump TBR (Temp basal rate) by 10-20%


Shows how we are all different Jo, I always use less insulin in the summer months than I do in the winter :crazy:
 
That is, a T1 looks at the amount of carbs they are going to eat and injects an amount of insulin accordingly.
A T2 (diet) looks at the amount of effective insulin available (fixed) and takes an amount of carbs accordingly.

jopar makes a valid point that there is more to picking insulin amounts than just carbs. As a one sentence simplification for an MP, I think the summary is decent.

We could also add that a person with type 2's insulin tank may have variables that affect things too -eg improved insulin sensitivity following an hour of playing squash or variations due to temperature. However, I can see that keeping things simple in this case has its merits.

Benedict
 
However, I can see that keeping things simple in this case has its merits.

Benedict

When it comes to any government MP, simple is definately best :lol: RRB
 
:lol:

I know if I were an MP being mailed about something that's far from my specialist subject, I'd appreciate something I could understand without over-straining my grey matter. :crazy:

To be fair to them, the range of issues they get contacted about must vary an awful lot.

Benedict
 
Grazer said:
Thank you Roy :lol: . And well done on at least trying to help things by writing to someone! Your point was well made. "Keep it simple" is the Mantra when explaining things to a lay person.

Fixed it now, oh so sorry Mr Grazer.
 
[quote="benedict
To be fair to them, the range of issues they get contacted about must vary an awful lot.
Benedict[/quote]

Maybe we should also be fair to GP's too then as they are "general practitioners" and get contacted on a massive range of issues.

Simple is most definitely the way forward, a thousand simple mails/letters saying T2's need testing strips or your dietary advice is codswallop will be more effective than a thousand long winded stories of personal experiences.

Seems to me that now might be the time for some "activists" on this site to contact the Times and other newspapers and ask them to tell the story of the people who have been low carbing for years. Strike while the iron's hot!
 
Scardoc said:
Seems to me that now might be the time for some "activists" on this site to contact the Times and other newspapers and ask them to tell the story of the people who have been low carbing for years. Strike while the iron's hot!

Baggsie do the Daily Fail and tell them about the wondrous life saving powers of Mr Atkins diet :lol:
 
Maybe we should also be fair to GP's too then as they are "general practitioners" and get contacted on a massive range of issues.

Funny you should say that, that very thought crossed my mind as I was writing it

Seems to me that now might be the time for some "activists" on this site to contact the Times and other newspapers and ask them to tell the story of the people who have been low carbing for years. Strike while the iron's hot!

...and for impact, if that person had managed to come off medication or reverse the presence of complications and that person's GP/consultant were comfortable to back up the claims, that could make a difference. Opens the question of whether an NHS doctor/consultant would be happy to do that though :?:

Benedict
 

I agree Benedict. Actually, the quote came from a different thread that I set up where i was trying, in a deliberately simplistic way, to show the difference in variables between a T1(or insulin dependant T2) and a T2 not on insulin.
That is, a T1 varies the insulin to match the carbs (YES I KNOW there are other things that effect this) whereas a T2 varies the carbs to match the EFFECTIVE (thus allowing for insulin resistance) insulin response available.
Of course exercise etc effects the equation, but the point was to show why T2s, especially diet only ones, fixate on carbs.
EFFECTIVE insulin available was also a point in showing why T2s on diet have to test; to see what their effective insulin is at different times and in different circumstances.
Sometimes, less words is best. Hence:-

T2s match carbs to insulin.
T1s match insulin to carbs
 

Thank you phoenix for your comprehensive explanation. I think I understand now that the US RDA of 130g/day is the (average) minimum sufficient to meet the cho requirement for nearly everyone. But the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range is 45-60%, which is in line with the UK Dietary Reference Value for cho of 47%. This level, it seems, comes about to meet energy needs while consuming acceptable levels of fat and protein.
So the Uk and US recommendations are about the same, but as Xyzzy says, the UK is a little more vague.
 
Further to my Letter to Ms Rosie Copper, MP for west Lancashire. Yesterday I received her reply, which I shall post link to my Documents, https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B-H6Cm ... l91eW9NV2c for you all to see. It would seem some MP's are concerned about the level and standards of care that Diabetics are receiving. But I think it has some way to go yet, still if we all write to our own MP's who knows. It is a lengthy reply with different information so stick with it.
I don't think you can post PDF on the forum,
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…