Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Food, Nutrition and Recipes
Beware the Bacon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 1968681" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>Yes there has been more recent studies that say the opposite/ I quote from a vegetarian publication that triumphantly trumpets those findings. The intro to the report in JAMA starts</p><p>"</p><p><em>A new study published in JAMA Internal Medicine indicates that vegetarians may be at lower risk for colorectal cancer than non-vegetarians, according to a <a href="http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/841097" target="_blank"><em>Medscape</em> </a>report. </em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>The study involved a large observational cohort of Seventh-Day Adventists. The researchers found that vegetarians had a 22 percent lower risk of colorectal cancer than those who ate meat. Unexpectedly, pescovegetarians had a 43 percent risk reduction</em>."</p><p></p><p>This study is actually the ADVENT2 study that has been shown to be totally biassed, poor methodology, and incorrect statistical analysis. The study was paid for, performed entirely by the 7th Day Adventist Church, and had NO independant peer review done on it. It is a Prospective study in that it uses observational data collection, and that method cannot in any way prove any cause. This same study data is used to underpin the claims being made by the WFPB fraternity, and has also appeared in the WHO meta studies, and forms part of the EAT-Lancet report on a sustainble diet for 2050.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 1968681, member: 196898"] Yes there has been more recent studies that say the opposite/ I quote from a vegetarian publication that triumphantly trumpets those findings. The intro to the report in JAMA starts " [I]A new study published in JAMA Internal Medicine indicates that vegetarians may be at lower risk for colorectal cancer than non-vegetarians, according to a [URL='http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/841097'][I]Medscape[/I] [/URL]report. The study involved a large observational cohort of Seventh-Day Adventists. The researchers found that vegetarians had a 22 percent lower risk of colorectal cancer than those who ate meat. Unexpectedly, pescovegetarians had a 43 percent risk reduction[/I]." This study is actually the ADVENT2 study that has been shown to be totally biassed, poor methodology, and incorrect statistical analysis. The study was paid for, performed entirely by the 7th Day Adventist Church, and had NO independant peer review done on it. It is a Prospective study in that it uses observational data collection, and that method cannot in any way prove any cause. This same study data is used to underpin the claims being made by the WFPB fraternity, and has also appeared in the WHO meta studies, and forms part of the EAT-Lancet report on a sustainble diet for 2050. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Food, Nutrition and Recipes
Beware the Bacon
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…