jay hay-char
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,683
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
I've never really paid much heed to BP, being of the "la la la, I'm not listening" school, so I never had it checked. Inevitably, it's been checked several times over the past couple of months: several times by my GP (anything between 120/80 and 135/85) and once by the Practice Nurse at my first review session, when it was 180/105-ish which - of course - caused panic and despondency (and I was a bit vexed too
). My GP very sensibly suggested that I get a cheapo BP monitor from Boots and measured it twice a day for a week, to get an average, having used the monitor for a week or so beforehand without taking readings, to get used to it and to stop it spooking me. I've done this and, after a week of measurement, I have an average of 130/80, with the highest systolic during the week being 136, and the lowest being 123. I now have to report back to the Quack.
My understanding is that this average puts me right at the top of the recommended scale for diabetics and I suspect that I'm going to come under pressure (see what I did there?) to go on some sort of medication to bring it down a bit - I don't think there is much else that I can do to reduce my BP: I only consume modest amounts of salt, don't drink much alcohol and have a normal BMI, plus I'm not giving up coffee (it's one of my few vices), though I have cut back recently. Any views, from those with previous similar experience, as to what the Doc is likely to say? Would I be foolish to allow the status quo to prevail? If I'm put under pressure to go on medication, what can I say (apart from "it's my life") to convince my GP that I'm not going to accept a drug regime? I know that I can tell him point blank that I am going to ignore his recommendation but we get on well, he is an excellent clinician and I don't want to antagonise him. However, I do have a concern, which seems to be coming true, that once you put yourself in the hands of the medical profession, they spend their time finding more and more things wrong with you, and order an ever increasing battery of tests and barrel-loads of medication for you. It's all done with the best of intentions, but I hate the idea of getting trapped on a pharmaceutical merry-go-round, consuming more and more stuff that meddles with my body chemistry.
I have normal total cholesterol (4.0) but I suspect there is going to be another, similar argument over statins, in due course.......
My understanding is that this average puts me right at the top of the recommended scale for diabetics and I suspect that I'm going to come under pressure (see what I did there?) to go on some sort of medication to bring it down a bit - I don't think there is much else that I can do to reduce my BP: I only consume modest amounts of salt, don't drink much alcohol and have a normal BMI, plus I'm not giving up coffee (it's one of my few vices), though I have cut back recently. Any views, from those with previous similar experience, as to what the Doc is likely to say? Would I be foolish to allow the status quo to prevail? If I'm put under pressure to go on medication, what can I say (apart from "it's my life") to convince my GP that I'm not going to accept a drug regime? I know that I can tell him point blank that I am going to ignore his recommendation but we get on well, he is an excellent clinician and I don't want to antagonise him. However, I do have a concern, which seems to be coming true, that once you put yourself in the hands of the medical profession, they spend their time finding more and more things wrong with you, and order an ever increasing battery of tests and barrel-loads of medication for you. It's all done with the best of intentions, but I hate the idea of getting trapped on a pharmaceutical merry-go-round, consuming more and more stuff that meddles with my body chemistry.
I have normal total cholesterol (4.0) but I suspect there is going to be another, similar argument over statins, in due course.......