Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Management
Other Health Conditions and Diabetes
bmj statins & lies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="phoenix" data-source="post: 543779" data-attributes="member: 12578"><p>These are the statements that have been withdrawn. You can follow them up rather than make assumptions:</p><p> <a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3329" target="_blank">http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3329</a></p><p> <a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3332" target="_blank">http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3332</a></p><p>The Editor of the BMJ says:</p><p> </p><p>I have decided that the right thing to do is to pass this decision to an independent panel. Iona Heath, former chairwoman of the Royal College of General Practitioners and of The BMJ’s ethics committee, has agreed to chair the panel, whose members will include people with no “dog in this fight,” but with expertise in clinical trial and observational study methodology, and in designing and implementing editorial policies on retraction. Full details of the panel and processes will be published shortly. I have asked that all submissions to the panel be placed in the public domain on bmj.com, and I have committed to implementing the panel’s recommendations in full</p><p><a href="http://retractionwatch.com/2014/05/14/bmj-authors-take-back-inaccurate-statin-safety-statements/" target="_blank">http://retractionwatch.com/2014/05/14/bmj-authors-take-back-inaccurate-statin-safety-statements/</a></p><p>It's a measure of the interest in the subject that it's been publicised, some retractions and alterations even in well publicised papers don't get a mention.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="phoenix, post: 543779, member: 12578"] These are the statements that have been withdrawn. You can follow them up rather than make assumptions: [url]http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3329[/url] [url]http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3332[/url] The Editor of the BMJ says: I have decided that the right thing to do is to pass this decision to an independent panel. Iona Heath, former chairwoman of the Royal College of General Practitioners and of The BMJ’s ethics committee, has agreed to chair the panel, whose members will include people with no “dog in this fight,” but with expertise in clinical trial and observational study methodology, and in designing and implementing editorial policies on retraction. Full details of the panel and processes will be published shortly. I have asked that all submissions to the panel be placed in the public domain on bmj.com, and I have committed to implementing the panel’s recommendations in full [url]http://retractionwatch.com/2014/05/14/bmj-authors-take-back-inaccurate-statin-safety-statements/[/url] It's a measure of the interest in the subject that it's been publicised, some retractions and alterations even in well publicised papers don't get a mention. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Management
Other Health Conditions and Diabetes
bmj statins & lies
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…