Reply to Thread

Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mbaker" data-source="post: 1874618" data-attributes="member: 256617">This is not accurate, he has published his method, invited others to try it, at least 50 I can find have, but I suspect more as this is a 2017 figure.  It is known that persons have used the Feldman protocol to lower cholesterol scores to obtain cheaper insurance, it takes around 3 days to produce these results.  The establishment of MD's and PhDs are quiet, because they have nothing to challenge him with.  He is not alone Zoe Harcombe and Ivor Cummins have also taken apart established views - such bad science.  I have the utmost respect for the Doctors who used to follow the standard line and in the face of obvious evidence have stood up:Dr Sarah Hamburg, Dr Jason Fung, Dr Eric Westman, Dr Tim Knoakes there are so many.The only reason why big business continues with LDL is because it has been so well monetarised via statins; attempts to create HDL increasing drugs have failed.  Even the WFPB movement have conceded that in women around 60 years of age, higher LDL is protective (this causes then a technical hurdle impossible to overcome).  The Big Fat Surprise gives further evidence how lowering cholesterol is harmful (particularly to women).  For me this is criminal.  We know that LDL fixes trauma, we know that HDL is protective to heart health and that low Trigs (the fat produced mainly by carbs) is another good health marker.  We know that LCHF / Keto tends to produce better HDL and lower Trig numbers due to saturated fat, so why on earth would we focus on 1 marker that has no sustained proof of harm.....statins.</blockquote>

Verification

Top Bottom

Search

Search

Reply to Thread