Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 2 Diabetes
Carbohydrate Counting... Is it Effective or Necessary?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KennyA" data-source="post: 2755991" data-attributes="member: 517579"><p>Thanks for posting this rather unusual paper. The thing that first jumps out at me about that bit of research is this in the exclusions from test: <em>low daily carbohydrate intake (defined as below 25 E% or <100 g/day). </em></p><p></p><p> That would exclude me and a lot of other folks. Given that it's often said that low carb proper starts at a level of under ~130g/day, what the research actually appears to be doing is seeing how well people with a significant carb intake manage to estimate their actual carb intake. In addition the sample size is small, and the individuals involved had an average diabetes duration of 16 years, a high HbA1c (63mmol/l - which must be some sort of an average, although I'd like to know how that was calculated) and nine out of ten were on some sort of medication(s) - eg 41 of 47 participants were on metformin. So - I would guess that few, if any, of these folks were on anything that we'd recognise as a low carb way of eating. So there are a number of potential confounders right there. </p><p></p><p>However, the critical thing is that the paper says</p><p></p><p><em> Total carbohydrate intake remained unchained (sic, presume they mean unchanged) during the intervention period, and we did not find any other dietary changes.</em> </p><p></p><p>I therefore don't find it in the least surprising that there was no change to HbA1c, regardless of how well or badly the study participants learned to estimate carbs. It seems obvious to me that carb-counting of itself can't do anything about blood glucose levels <u>unless the information is then used to reduce carb intake</u>. </p><p></p><p>It's a bit baffling that they infer that they sort of expected carb-counting itself to have some impact on blood glucose. My take would be that the study might demonstrate that teaching people with the characteristics of this group to carb count is pointless unless the information is then used to drive carb reduction. No carb reduction, no reduction in HbA1c. And to my mind to reduce carbs you really have to have some idea of how many you're actually eating.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KennyA, post: 2755991, member: 517579"] Thanks for posting this rather unusual paper. The thing that first jumps out at me about that bit of research is this in the exclusions from test: [I]low daily carbohydrate intake (defined as below 25 E% or <100 g/day). [/I] That would exclude me and a lot of other folks. Given that it's often said that low carb proper starts at a level of under ~130g/day, what the research actually appears to be doing is seeing how well people with a significant carb intake manage to estimate their actual carb intake. In addition the sample size is small, and the individuals involved had an average diabetes duration of 16 years, a high HbA1c (63mmol/l - which must be some sort of an average, although I'd like to know how that was calculated) and nine out of ten were on some sort of medication(s) - eg 41 of 47 participants were on metformin. So - I would guess that few, if any, of these folks were on anything that we'd recognise as a low carb way of eating. So there are a number of potential confounders right there. However, the critical thing is that the paper says [I] Total carbohydrate intake remained unchained (sic, presume they mean unchanged) during the intervention period, and we did not find any other dietary changes.[/I] I therefore don't find it in the least surprising that there was no change to HbA1c, regardless of how well or badly the study participants learned to estimate carbs. It seems obvious to me that carb-counting of itself can't do anything about blood glucose levels [U]unless the information is then used to reduce carb intake[/U]. It's a bit baffling that they infer that they sort of expected carb-counting itself to have some impact on blood glucose. My take would be that the study might demonstrate that teaching people with the characteristics of this group to carb count is pointless unless the information is then used to drive carb reduction. No carb reduction, no reduction in HbA1c. And to my mind to reduce carbs you really have to have some idea of how many you're actually eating. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 2 Diabetes
Carbohydrate Counting... Is it Effective or Necessary?
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…