Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 2 Diabetes
CGM vs finger pricking: too much data?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KennyA" data-source="post: 2585758" data-attributes="member: 517579"><p>I tried a libre but it rarely matched the fingerprick, even allowing for the fact that it tests interstitial fluid rather than blood, and therefore has a "lag" time. The best I got was a libre reading that tracked the fingerprick well but gave a consistent reading around 1.5/2.0 mmol/l below. </p><p></p><p>On the other hand, even with the allowance for inaccuracy, it did give me useful info about what happened while I was sleeping. It was worth doing as a one off (in my opinion) but not something I'd pay for regularly.</p><p></p><p>Just a point: as I understand it, the two hour reading is not primarily intended to find out how high you've gone after eating. Everyone's BG rises after taking in carbs. A raeding at two hours is intended to assess whether one's levels have returned to an acceptable range by the two hour mark, and by extension how well your system is responding to your insulin.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KennyA, post: 2585758, member: 517579"] I tried a libre but it rarely matched the fingerprick, even allowing for the fact that it tests interstitial fluid rather than blood, and therefore has a "lag" time. The best I got was a libre reading that tracked the fingerprick well but gave a consistent reading around 1.5/2.0 mmol/l below. On the other hand, even with the allowance for inaccuracy, it did give me useful info about what happened while I was sleeping. It was worth doing as a one off (in my opinion) but not something I'd pay for regularly. Just a point: as I understand it, the two hour reading is not primarily intended to find out how high you've gone after eating. Everyone's BG rises after taking in carbs. A raeding at two hours is intended to assess whether one's levels have returned to an acceptable range by the two hour mark, and by extension how well your system is responding to your insulin. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 2 Diabetes
CGM vs finger pricking: too much data?
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…