I'm worried that the only way to go is to try other statins.
The figure of 6.2 for total cholesterol is not particularly high. As others have said it's the breakdown that matters. I believe that cholesterol is good for the body full stop. Most of the discussion centres on the lipoproteins that carry cholesterol in the blood stream. It's the low density lipoprotein (LDL) that has been called "bad" and associated with negative outcomes. However, recent research shows that the small dense LDL is most likely the bad guy, rather than LDL per se. Unfortunately, this can only be measured directly by expensive tests. The good news is that it is directly associated with low levels of triglycerides, which you can get free on the NHS. You need to ask your doctor for a fasting blood test. A triglyceride level less than 1.0 means that you have low small dense LDL. Look up Ken Sikaris on the internet for a good presentation.Hi guys,
It's been a few years since I've posted. I'm Type 1 aged 37, 38 in a few weeks.
I've been nailing my HBa1c since diagnosis (40-43/44 each time). However my cholestrol is high and when the doc tried to put me on statins a few years ago my liver reacted super badly to it - so I had to come off. Apart from the sudden and massive reduction in ability to function on a day to day level, it contributed to a very low feeling for a very long time afterwards.
I've cut out drinking, reduced saturated fats, increased vegetables, roughage, porridge, increased excercise etc. However I just got my latest results for cholestrol and I'm coming in a 6.2mmol, which I know is bad.
Honestly I'm scared. Scared because I know what a high cholestrol can mean to a normal healthy person, even more so for us Type 1s.
I'm worried that the only way to go is to try other statins. Having lived through the last attempt I'm worried about what that could do to my health, business and relationships.
Any advice or support very much welcome.
AD x
Any advice or support very much welcome.
AD x
Thanks man - that was a really helpful response and definitely throws a different light on it.There are lots of threads about statins here. Hopefully someone else can post some links. In a nutshell, all diabetics regardless of cholesterol levels are supposed to be on statins according to the standard care guidelines. However, there are sceptics (such as myself) who believe that the benefits of statins has been overinflated and the dangers (i.e. side effects) minimised by the companies that sell statins. I was on statins for a couple of months about 12 years ago and I had to stop due to muscle weakness (I remember spending most of a weekend prone and virtually unable to do much just before I figured out it was the statin). I have never felt quite the same since. The link between total cholesterol and cardiovascular disease is weak and the link between saturated fat and cardiovascular disease is also weak. In fact, the higher your cholesterol, the longer you'll live. Stress is not good for your heart, so stressing about your cholesterol levels is probably worse for your heart than your cholesterol levels. I recommend reading some books about it written by sceptics. They have lots of references to scientific papers that refute the saturated fat-cholesterol-heart disease theory and the theory that statins are beneficial. One of the biggest problems with statins is that their safety and efficacy are based on drug trials run and interpreted by the companies that want to sell them, so they tend to be biased.
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/books-by-dr-malcolm-kendrick/the-great-cholesterol-con/
Thanks Bluetit - that's a good shout. I have the printout now.Yes, I agree that you need the full breakdown of your lipids. (HDL/LDL/Triglycerides/ratios) The total is actually meaningless without knowing the numbers used in arriving at this total. If you don't know the breakdown I suggest you ask for a print out or enquire as to whether your surgery puts these on-line (as all English surgeries were asked to do before April 2016)
Thank you!The figure of 6.2 for total cholesterol is not particularly high. As others have said it's the breakdown that matters. I believe that cholesterol is good for the body full stop. Most of the discussion centres on the lipoproteins that carry cholesterol in the blood stream. It's the low density lipoprotein (LDL) that has been called "bad" and associated with negative outcomes. However, recent research shows that the small dense LDL is most likely the bad guy, rather than LDL per se. Unfortunately, this can only be measured directly by expensive tests. The good news is that it is directly associated with low levels of triglycerides, which you can get free on the NHS. You need to ask your doctor for a fasting blood test. A triglyceride level less than 1.0 means that you have low small dense LDL. Look up Ken Sikaris on the internet for a good presentation.
Some fair points there for sure.I'm not pushing any particular diet but you'd be surprised how much total cholesterol drops when you cut carbs. It could be my body doesn't work properly because this last year, I increased fats by eating more cheese, nuts and yoghurt, even some cream and my total cholesterol dropped from 5.4 to 4. S that seems to go against what doctors are telling us.
The annoying thing with the whole cholesterol story is that your reading would have had your doctor patting you on the back . . . . in 1997.
The other thing that goes through my mind, having stopped statins 3 years ago after 17 years of muscle pain and BS excuses from my doctor, cholesterol isn't the direct cause of the problem, it's the arteriosclerosis where the cholesterol may start to clump together causing the blockages. If I had my time again, I would have asked for some sort of scan to see how bad the problem is. It's only because of an unnecessary visit to a U.S. hospital that I know my arteries are in pretty good shape for my age.
Some very fair points.I'm not pushing any particular diet but you'd be surprised how much total cholesterol drops when you cut carbs. It could be my body doesn't work properly because this last year, I increased fats by eating more cheese, nuts and yoghurt, even some cream and my total cholesterol dropped from 5.4 to 4. S that seems to go against what doctors are telling us.
The annoying thing with the whole cholesterol story is that your reading would have had your doctor patting you on the back . . . . in 1997.
The other thing that goes through my mind, having stopped statins 3 years ago after 17 years of muscle pain and BS excuses from my doctor, cholesterol isn't the direct cause of the problem, it's the arteriosclerosis where the cholesterol may start to clump together causing the blockages. If I had my time again, I would have asked for some sort of scan to see how bad the problem is. It's only because of an unnecessary visit to a U.S. hospital that I know my arteries are in pretty good shape for my age.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?