Chris Secker
Member
- Messages
- 14
- Type of diabetes
- Prediabetes
- Treatment type
- I do not have diabetes
It was 47,
It was 47,Well if that’s your numbers you have it pretty much almost there. Your aim is to have a rise of less than 2 2 hrs after eating, your return to 2 hrs before is excellent as your back to where you started.
But your start numbers are ever so slightly high so you can work on that by reducing carbs (not just sugars) further.
There are some links in my signature you may find helpful.
It’s a marathon not a sprint and take your time to learn and read through things. There’s a lot to get your head round. Do you know what your Hba1c was when you were diagnosed? If it’s just on the cusp of pre diabetic then you may not need to tweak it too much
Thank you so muchJust a small point on blood sugar readings. Our blood sugars fluctuate minute by minute, day by day. They are never the same at any given time, as there are so many factors that influence blood sugar levels,
; sleep; food choices and compositions; hormone levels; physical activity; stressors; signalling between your liver and your pancreas; the time of day, immune responses that we may not to be aware of, even temperature and our general sense of well being. It’s complicated. Decisions are made regarding how well out bodies handle blood sugars are taken over time, as patterns emerge, for a reason.
Whether you reach the medical threshold for diabetes is measured over a three month period. Then it is tested again 3 months later .This allows for blood sugar patterns to emerge over time.
So that’s the top end of pre diabetes, your on the cusp of possibly T2 which starts at 48 so getting those numbers down would be beneficial.It was 47,
I tried to get another blood test done 3 months after the 1st one and they refused and said i could ask for another in a year and not before!!!!! i wasnt impressed as getting this sorted sooner is going to be better.So that’s the top end of pre diabetes, your on the cusp of possibly T2 which starts at 48 so getting those numbers down would be beneficial.
Have they asked you to have a follow up test to confirm? That’s the usual way, and a second test would give you the latest info for you to work with
I would try again if I were in your positionI tried to get another blood test done 3 months after the 1st one and they refused and said i could ask for another in a year and not before!!!!! i wasnt impressed as getting this sorted sooner is going to be better.
As you are testing your blood glucose now, that could assist in lowering both blood glucose and HbA1c.I tried to get another blood test done 3 months after the 1st one and they refused and said i could ask for another in a year and not before!!!!! i wasnt impressed as getting this sorted sooner is going to be better.
They aren't eligible as they haven't been diagnosed with diabetes only pre-diabetes. That would be why they have been told to wait until next year.I would try again if I were in your position
This from N.I.C.E. Guidelines
Link to the full guidelines
- If the person is asymptomatic, do not diagnose diabetes on the basis of a single abnormal HbA1c or plasma glucose result. Arrange repeat testing, preferably with the same test, to confirm the diagnosis. If the repeat test result is normal, arrange to monitor the person for the development of diabetes, the frequency depending on clinical judgement.
Diagnosis in adults | Diagnosis | Diabetes - type 2 | CKS | NICE
Diagnosis in adults, Diagnosis, Diabetes - type 2, CKScks.nice.org.uk
No harm @Chris Secker asking again and perhaps using the NICE guidelines to their advantage - at 47 they’re one point off T2 - I’d use this as my argument.They aren't eligible as they haven't been diagnosed with diabetes only pre-diabetes. That would be why they have been told to wait until next year.
Sent from my SM-G991B using Diabetes.co.uk Forum mobile app
Thank you, ill insist on a new test, cheersI would try again if I were in your position
This from N.I.C.E. Guidelines
Link to the full guidelines
- If the person is asymptomatic, do not diagnose diabetes on the basis of a single abnormal HbA1c or plasma glucose result. Arrange repeat testing, preferably with the same test, to confirm the diagnosis. If the repeat test result is normal, arrange to monitor the person for the development of diabetes, the frequency depending on clinical judgement.
Diagnosis in adults | Diagnosis | Diabetes - type 2 | CKS | NICE
Diagnosis in adults, Diagnosis, Diabetes - type 2, CKScks.nice.org.uk
You’re welcome, let us know how it goes if you canThank you, ill insist on a new test, cheers
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?