Seriously? That's almost a Daily Mail standard of comment. The risk of Salmonella from eggs on a single occasion is something stupid like 1 in 100,000, or in other words, not very likely at all. Please don't make statements like that!Egg yolks, may be the answer, however "salmonella" should be considered when dealing with eggs.
It was not a statement , just a precautionary measure with regard to raw egg yolks.Seriously? That's almost a Daily Mail standard of comment. The risk of Salmonella from eggs on a single occasion is something stupid like 1 in 100,000, or in other words, not very likely at all. Please don't make statements like that!
@Andy12345 being a little argumentative today I found the following stats somewhere :i believe it to be 1 in 60,000 eggs carry salmonella and only 1 in 100 people that have it have anything more serious than mild discomfort, so i reckon that means 1 in every 600,000 eggs you have to worry, i eat a lot of eggs but reckon it'll take a while to eat that many
(stats from memory)
eggs rock!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?