Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
CoQ10, diabetes, statins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DavidGrahamJones" data-source="post: 1620255" data-attributes="member: 245335"><p>I'm not a patent expert . . . . . . by my wife is.</p><p></p><p>Merck obtained a patent in 1990 for a statin with CoQ10 combined pill, I mention pill because it's delivery is part of the patent. <a href="https://www.functionalmedicineuniversity.com/statin-CoQ10.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.functionalmedicineuniversity.com/statin-CoQ10.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>The way patents work means that only one entity (person, company) will obtain a patent, any further applications will be rejected because they will not pass the novelty step (there would be prior art). Obtaining a patent isn't cheap but companies like Merck will have their own attorneys in their own country and may employ other firms of patent attorneys to obtain the patent in other countries. Patents are never refused because of cost, but a company may decide not to pursue it's application because of cost, it may decide not to do anything with their patent, possibly hoping to license some other company to make the product or it might even use their patent as a way of stopping anyone else doing it.</p><p></p><p>The interesting thing about the Merck patent is that it actually mentions "impending muscle pain" as if it's a forgone conclusion. They also discuss where they are going to obtain the CoQ10 because even in 1990 it was available. </p><p></p><p>There are several countries that prescribe CoQ10 along with statins and Japan uses CoQ10 widely, especially for people who have had cardio vascular events.</p><p></p><p>In my case I found it difficult to find a suitable dose, my GP couldn't tell me because it wasn't something she could prescribe and I didn't find any relief in the side effects of statins, possibly because I didn't take enough or, as I have read, there is a question over absorption. My wife took great pleasure in recommending an alternative way of taking CoQ10 with guaranteed absorption, and that's up the backside.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DavidGrahamJones, post: 1620255, member: 245335"] I'm not a patent expert . . . . . . by my wife is. Merck obtained a patent in 1990 for a statin with CoQ10 combined pill, I mention pill because it's delivery is part of the patent. [URL]https://www.functionalmedicineuniversity.com/statin-CoQ10.pdf[/URL] The way patents work means that only one entity (person, company) will obtain a patent, any further applications will be rejected because they will not pass the novelty step (there would be prior art). Obtaining a patent isn't cheap but companies like Merck will have their own attorneys in their own country and may employ other firms of patent attorneys to obtain the patent in other countries. Patents are never refused because of cost, but a company may decide not to pursue it's application because of cost, it may decide not to do anything with their patent, possibly hoping to license some other company to make the product or it might even use their patent as a way of stopping anyone else doing it. The interesting thing about the Merck patent is that it actually mentions "impending muscle pain" as if it's a forgone conclusion. They also discuss where they are going to obtain the CoQ10 because even in 1990 it was available. There are several countries that prescribe CoQ10 along with statins and Japan uses CoQ10 widely, especially for people who have had cardio vascular events. In my case I found it difficult to find a suitable dose, my GP couldn't tell me because it wasn't something she could prescribe and I didn't find any relief in the side effects of statins, possibly because I didn't take enough or, as I have read, there is a question over absorption. My wife took great pleasure in recommending an alternative way of taking CoQ10 with guaranteed absorption, and that's up the backside. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
CoQ10, diabetes, statins
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…