• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Could your wifi router be used in the future to monitor for night time hypos

Bill_St

Well-Known Member
Messages
263
Type of diabetes
Type 1
Treatment type
Insulin
Without ANY direct connection to your body
Medscape:

How Wi-Fi Could Become an Invisible, No-Touch ECG

Wi-Fi signals bounce off humans in predictable patterns and can detect respiration and pulse, creating an invisible, whole-room health monitor that never touches the patient.

Wi-Fi signals already fill our homes, offices, and hospitals — invisible waves constantly transmitting data between routers and countless devices. Now researchers are exploring how ubiquitous signals could serve a secondary purpose in healthcare.

The concept is surprisingly straightforward: As Wi-Fi signals transmit through a room, they encounter human bodies and bounce off them in predictable patterns. These subtle disturbances in the signal can reveal movement, breathing patterns, and even heartbeats. Like invisible sonar constantly pinging through our spaces, Wi-Fi creates a field of information that, when properly decoded, can track the rhythms of human life.

“Wi-Fi signals can work as sensors, transparent sensors that you don’t see,” said Katia Obraczka, PhD, engineering professor at University of California at Santa Cruz. “Given that Wi-Fi is such widespread technology — you have Wi-Fi all over the place — it’s very convenient to use it to measure different things.”

For healthcare settings, this technology could address persistent challenges. Hospital patients who remove monitoring devices, elderly residents who forget to wear fall detection pendants, or children who won’t tolerate sleep study equipment might all be monitored through existing Wi-Fi infrastructure.

Emergency departments could assess breathing rates in waiting rooms, while rehabilitation centers might track mobility patterns without attaching sensors to patients. A triage station could obtain ECG measurements while patients simply wait in chairs. The technology promises continuous, passive monitoring without the compliance issues, skin irritation, or battery life concerns of wearable devices.“

While Pulse-Fi focuses on heart rate, researchers can measure multiple health parameters using Wi-Fi simultaneously by analyzing different patterns in signal disturbances. Qammer Abbasi, PhD, engineering professor at University of Glasgow, explained that the heartbeat creates tiny, rapid vibrations, whereas breathing produces larger, slower movements. Falls, body movements, and sleep pattern changes create even bigger displacements—each leaving its own signature in the Wi-Fi field.“

 
Last edited:
Nothing at all in the article on how wifi could detect hypos.
Early experiments are done with hear rate, and it's a very long way away from functioning.
To detect a hypo, it has to measure BG, and there are currently not even dedicated devices able to do this without penetrating, and even CGMs measuring glucose in interstitial fluid aren't that accurate.
Goodbye Sensors
I'd keep the sensor and glucose meter for a bit.
 
Old:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3692220/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3632150/#s1

I'd keep the sensor and glucose meter for a bit
Your bit might not be that long ;)

Drs replaced by $30 raspberry pi
Consultants giving palliative care to the NHS
Some actually providing Nursing care to patients
Welcome to the new world ;) of AI

Severe hypoglycemia is preceded by changes in both ECG and EEG features in most cases. Electroencephalogram theta power may be superior with respect to timing, sensitivity, and specificity of severe hypoglycemia detection. A multiparameter algorithm that combines data from different biosensors might be considered.

And new:
 
Last edited:
The idea of it is very exciting but what happens if i,m half way across the pennines ?
Would we have to spend our entire lives within detector distance of a wi fi signal although some people do that already lol.

Its quite mind boggling and i love a good boggle!

Tony
 
The concept would be very useful for the elderly, many in care homes and unlikely to go to the Pennines but also forgetful for medications and having difficulty with technology. A $30 Dr in the room is potentially viable.
 
It’s all well and good until the WiFi goes down or the power goes out and then what. WiFi can be so unpredictable and I think I’d rather rely on a sensor that is attached to my body than something that could fail for long periods of time at any time. I know glucose sensors do fail but they’re quick and easy to get running again.
 
Back
Top