HSSS, I too have low levels I found all sorts on high levels being related to kidney damage, but very little on low levels. Except low levels in the elderly and fail is down to lost muscle mass. I just put it down to my disability and atrophied muscles (even though I have been improving for the past few years) was thinking about starting gentle exercise to improve muscle strength.
I’m sorry you have it too but glad I’m not the only only struggling to find the implications. I’m neither elderly nor have disabilities, though not especially strong or active beyond daily life activities. I don’t feel like I’ve lost muscle or strength. Why have a lower limit if there’s not some relevance to it?HSSS, I too have low levels I found all sorts on high levels being related to kidney damage, but very little on low levels. Except low levels in the elderly and fail is down to lost muscle mass. I just put it down to my disability and atrophied muscles (even though I have been improving for the past few years) was thinking about starting gentle exercise to improve muscle strength.
Good god no.@HSSS Wouldn't happen to be pregnant would you?
Good god no.Definitely passed that stage. Also it’s been dropping for over a year now so although I started elephant sized I don’t share their gestation period.
My liver tests also look ok (as another potential reason for being low) so I doubt that’s the cause hence my bafflement.
I’ve checked everything google has to offerCreatine levels
think the best answer i can give is check the NHS site ref kidneys or medicine net .
all give very good advice and as per normal it is given in up to date numbers as things now change like our blood sugars nos it i think 7.5 blood sugar is good in the new no it would be 53 or so on hope this helps
vic
Possibly. I’ve decided to ask again next time I’m there for other stuff but in the meantime as the big red “abnormal” is being ignored by drs each time it occurs I will too.As it is a waste product from the break down of muscle maybe the lower the better hence no information on the draw backs of low levels as there are none.
The only thing I could find a hint of is that higher levels may slow bacterial action down and inhibit bacterial infections a bit so you may not get it's antibacterial effect at lower levels.
As to why have low and high limits it could be that they just denote the range of normal levels.
Mine been dropping a little every test for the last 15 months, always below range so not a blip. I lost weight in the first 4 months but that’s been stable since then and don’t feel I’ve lost muscle either initially or since weight loss. Increasing exercise seem my only sensible option to increase it but that still doesn’t explain why it’s falling. It’s obviously the less worry end of the range to be outside of though.I'm ancient and certainly not an excercise bunny, but my creatinine levels have always been stable in the middle of the range. That is until my last test in July. It dropped (plasma - I didn't have the urine test) to one point above the low range level. As it is still normal, I am looking at it as a blip. No way can I have had a lot of muscle loss in the 6 months since the previous test. I will have another look if this continues as a trend.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?