• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Current issue of "Balance"

hanadr

Expert
Messages
8,157
Dislikes
soaps on telly and people talking about the characters as if they were real.
I just finished reading the current edition of "Balance" Sept/Oct 2008 number 225.
there's some good stuff on strips, a letter from 2 specialist Dieticians, which warns about added sugar not being the only source of glucose in food A bit about cutting the shopping bills, which might help some people. A bit about driving licences.
the government setting the stroy straight about strip rationing. ie the PCTs are not meant to do it, but no-one is telling them to follow NICE guidelines.
diabetes UKs rating of the National Service Framework for Diabetes Score 2/5! Could do Better!
More about Pumps
Altogether quite a good mag.
THEN
there it is on page 67
Labelled
So, what is "healthy eating"? and Stick it on the fridge
At each meal include starchy carbohydrate foodssuch asbread, pasta, chapattis potatoes, yam, noodles,rice and cereals. doesn't the editor read through what is printed? It's someone else's turn to point out to them that they are contradicting themselves again. they don't take any notice of me
 
I was going to post that, Hana :wink:

I'll follow up my previous email to Careline. (If there were an "o" in the middle it would be a real person, Caroline )
 
I have already emailed them to complain about something else: there's an article about getting the flu jab, and about what to do if you have flu. Nowhere in the entire article does it mention testing for ketones. I pointed out that for type 1s this is essential and could be a matter of life and death. I also questioned whether this was an example of Balance being aimed predominantly at type 2s.
 
I think Balance has a difficult choice because splitting it between 1's and 2's is clearly a tricky balancing(LOL) act. Maybe half of the mag for T1's and 2nd half for T2's.

Its only like on this forum though - so many conversations start for T2's and its not clear until 3rd or 4th thread, which I'm not interested in as I'm T1.

They definately need to think about restructuring it. A lot of the articles too are high level overviews and if they went into a lot of detail would probably confuse the heck out of many diabetics of whatever varient!

They dont really address concerns that members raise either! As a campaign vehicle I feel they should be able to.
 
At last a reply .....

 
So if we all joined DUK 's forum would the info suddenly become accurate because it was on their site!!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…