Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Diabetes and other things
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NicoleC1971" data-source="post: 2447691" data-attributes="member: 365308"><p>It is more fundamental than how much money gets spent on research given that for many of these diseases we cannot get to a consensus on what causes the diseases and therefore how to cure them. Furthermore there are plenty of people for whom finding a non pharmaceutical cure would destroy their business model. In the current set up Big Food and Big Pharma want to keep you alive long enough to be a lifetime consumer of drugs and bad food. Governments should have an incentive to reduce the terrible costs of this model but when the research is biased and the lobbying machines rely on muddying the waters to perpetuate the status quo, it is hardly surprising that they lack the will or competence to change our health habits. Instead Public Health has been re branded Health Security which gives us a clue to its focus going forward.</p><p>Independent research would certainly help take the debate forward with more discussion on options which truly tackle root causes of disease.</p><p>In the meantime your stock market investments should be very safe in Pzhizer, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Nestle and Coca Cola.</p><p> The topic of chronic underlying ill health is one that should be front and centre in any debate about our public health so thanks to the OP for sharing the article!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NicoleC1971, post: 2447691, member: 365308"] It is more fundamental than how much money gets spent on research given that for many of these diseases we cannot get to a consensus on what causes the diseases and therefore how to cure them. Furthermore there are plenty of people for whom finding a non pharmaceutical cure would destroy their business model. In the current set up Big Food and Big Pharma want to keep you alive long enough to be a lifetime consumer of drugs and bad food. Governments should have an incentive to reduce the terrible costs of this model but when the research is biased and the lobbying machines rely on muddying the waters to perpetuate the status quo, it is hardly surprising that they lack the will or competence to change our health habits. Instead Public Health has been re branded Health Security which gives us a clue to its focus going forward. Independent research would certainly help take the debate forward with more discussion on options which truly tackle root causes of disease. In the meantime your stock market investments should be very safe in Pzhizer, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Nestle and Coca Cola. The topic of chronic underlying ill health is one that should be front and centre in any debate about our public health so thanks to the OP for sharing the article! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Diabetes and other things
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…