wiredwoman
Member
- Messages
- 9
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
Finally, when I pushed him on the decision to disallow testing being purely financial he said that was part of it but that every diabetic expert, and all the conferences he attends the consensus is that testing does not lead to better control.
It's the same reason because I, being on statins I could only test cholesterol and transaminase once a year Money .If I have to fund that myself then so be it but I’m confused after the conversation with my doctor as to the real reason why I shouldn’t do it.
How can I possibly know how I react to different foods and exercise when I’m not allowed to test.
Thanks Tanis, yes my thoughts exactly. I want to have as much control of this as possible and not rely on an annual HBA1c to see where I'm going wrong. I can understand, even if I'm not happy with financial constraints being the reason but I was puzzled by the 'expert' opinion.Three times i have asked for testing equipment but have been told no as i am on Metformin and not at risk of hypos. I want to test for ME! I need to know what my body is doing. I need to know my triggers. So i bought my own equipment and test 3 times a day. It helps me so much. It is my body and i will do what i want with it. If i want to test, i will! I do not believe it can do any harm and dont believe a little obsession with blood levels is a bad thing when you are dealing with a disease that can ultimately kill you. I do believe Drs. are driven by costs in this case.
You have answered your own question here
If they really believe it, then it is complete claptrap. Buy an SD codefree meter. Test before and 2 hours after meals. Eliminate those carb foods which cause the greatest spikes. I believe I am right in saying that, if you reduce carbs, there is the possibility of becoming over medicated, so you need to be careful.Hello! Newly diagnosed about 5 months ago, (although I have been here before because my husband has had Type 2 for 15 years and we’ve benefitted greatly from the advice on this forum, thank you!)
On the day of my own diagnosis I was told not only that I wouldn’t be given a meter/test strips but that the doctor didn’t want me to test at all. Instead he would be giving me a ‘miracle’ drug (Empagliflozin) that ‘you will love’ because I would lose weight.
Fast forward 5 months and I have indeed lost weight, how much is due to the wonder drug is difficult to assess because I have also completely changed my lifestyle - low carbing and daily treadmill. The doctor on seeing my weight reduction was delighted with himself and the miracle drug and I had to remind him that I’d actually put in quite a lot of work myself! My HBAIC has reduced from 10.6 to 7.3. All going in the right direction except now that my weight has plateaued I really would like to test to see what spikes me. Would I be better eating a potato or a slice of wholemeal bread? How can I possibly know how I react to different foods and exercise when I’m not allowed to test. So on this visit I politely requested to be allowed to test and the response was interesting. At first I was told I don’t need to and when I mentioned NICE guidelines/lifestyle changes he said NICE can say what they like but they don’t have to manage his budget. I asked if this was a financial decision and he said “Yes, of course.” But later he said he would prefer to prescribe the expensive wonder drug at £40 a month (he could have given me a cheaper drug (Glimepiride) but I would have gained 10kg instead of losing it!) This drug is not recommended as a first step apparently but he is prepared to ignore the guidelines if he is passionate about an issue. Finally, when I pushed him on the decision to disallow testing being purely financial he said that was part of it but that every diabetic expert, and all the conferences he attends the consensus is that testing does not lead to better control.
So that’s my question. Is it true that diabetic experts believe that patients kept in the dark do better ultimately? It seems unlikely to me, but I’m open to being proved wrong. I really feel that I need to know what’s happening to my body, not to be obsessive about it but to understand what makes a difference. If I have to fund that myself then so be it but I’m confused after the conversation with my doctor as to the real reason why I shouldn’t do it.
Your doctor sounds a real charmer.. maybe look around for another.. I think that the "studies" that allegedly show that testing doesn't lead to better control do not include educating people on how to interpret their results. Because the Low Carb High Fat diet is currently outside the advice given by HCP's then most will not advocate. So if you test, take meds and don't change your diet you are almost doomed to failure from the start. Therefore in that scenario testing is indeed a waste of time and resources. If however you test, eat to your meter i.e. modify your diet to take account of your readings, then you can make major changes to your condition. That's what I have found anyway, in my limited experience.Thanks for your response. Yes, as I mentioned I can fund my own testing if necessary but my question was more about whether diabetic experts, the ones who host the conferences, etc are coming up with rationales so that doctors on the front line can justify non-testing. It would make it more comfortable I'm sure to feel there is an alternative reason rather than saying we don't want to fund you. Or *conspiracy theory alert* maybe the conferences are funded by big Pharma who don't really want us to control and possibly reverse our diabetes. My doctor has said that although I have reduced my BG he is expecting that it will rise next time ("it's just human nature") and then he's going to put me on this or that drug and then 'injections' - he seemed very sure and enthusiastic!
It's like the courses for the newlyleds that are done by nuns... :-0don't actually suffer from the issue themselves.
Why anyone would consider somebody without first hand experience of something an "expert" on a subject is beyond me
What I could see is that if you don't give the "cultural" tools to make a reasonable choice you are getting bad results anyway. I've watched the transmission on ITV when the people that followed the dieting indications has lost weight when the one that "had" to eat the birthday cake not, was enlightening.the experience will be empowering and result in greater health and fewer long term complications.
But doctors are not trained/educated/open to the idea that dietary control is possible for the fat, lazy, greedy, slothful T2s.
After all, they ate their way to this condition, so they haven't got the self control to change... (and no, I don't agree with this thinking)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?