Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Soapbox - Have Your Say
Dr Haroun Gajraj: Why I've Ditched Statins for Good
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dillinger" data-source="post: 510881" data-attributes="member: 13582"><p>Indeed, and may well even be non deliberate; I'd think it unlikely that these doctors leave the room with a swish of their black capes whilst cackling 'Mwah-ha-ha-haaa' thinking another terrible crime has been expertly carried out. That's why double blind studies are so important because of the recognised risk of bias which is a normal human condition; we all pull for our own world view after all...</p><p></p><p>On the statistical thing it seems that this epidemiological approach to medicine is all very well when looking at contagious disease in a population but not at more subtle (non-contagious) illnesses like heart disease with multiple, not very well understood, risk factors. With the spread of measles it makes sense that the entire population receives immunisations but that is just not the case when you are looking at CVD especially as there seems such **** poor analysis of the causes of it. Eggs! For god's sake! They think eggs cause heart disease and expect me to take them seriously on anything else!? I can see how the very damaging fear of immunisations arises perhaps in parallel with this declining respect for the medical profession as a whole.</p><p></p><p>Best</p><p></p><p>Dillinger</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dillinger, post: 510881, member: 13582"] Indeed, and may well even be non deliberate; I'd think it unlikely that these doctors leave the room with a swish of their black capes whilst cackling 'Mwah-ha-ha-haaa' thinking another terrible crime has been expertly carried out. That's why double blind studies are so important because of the recognised risk of bias which is a normal human condition; we all pull for our own world view after all... On the statistical thing it seems that this epidemiological approach to medicine is all very well when looking at contagious disease in a population but not at more subtle (non-contagious) illnesses like heart disease with multiple, not very well understood, risk factors. With the spread of measles it makes sense that the entire population receives immunisations but that is just not the case when you are looking at CVD especially as there seems such **** poor analysis of the causes of it. Eggs! For god's sake! They think eggs cause heart disease and expect me to take them seriously on anything else!? I can see how the very damaging fear of immunisations arises perhaps in parallel with this declining respect for the medical profession as a whole. Best Dillinger [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Soapbox - Have Your Say
Dr Haroun Gajraj: Why I've Ditched Statins for Good
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…