Not quite the same surely.
If you as a Type1 were to drop the insulin you would be very ill... possibly dead.
If I as a Type 2 went back to my old ways of eating i'd simply be stupid.
Bulkbiker, of course, I was trying to make a point that in either case (which are different) reverting back to 'normal' would make both types ill.
As you say the conditions are completely different thus trying to make comparisons between "in remission" is a bit daft to be honest.
If a Type 1 has a succesful pancreas transplant which leads to beta cell regeneration then I guess they would be "in remission" @Grant_Vicat I'm assuming you would say so?
Maybe in the case of Daniel Darkes you could say he's in remission too.
For Type 2's remission is feasible by dietary change (maybe with minimal medication) so is a completely different thing. Mainly because the two conditions have completely different causes even if they share a name.
hi @bulkbiker I think remission is exactly the right term. The Forum constantly reminds us that a pancreas transplant is not a cure. Although I understand the reasons, I feel cured. But remission allows for the fact that transplants may not last, as in the case of at least one unfortunate lady on the Forum.As you say the conditions are completely different thus trying to make comparisons between "in remission" is a bit daft to be honest.
If a Type 1 has a succesful pancreas transplant which leads to beta cell regeneration then I guess they would be "in remission" @Grant_Vicat I'm assuming you would say so?
Maybe in the case of Daniel Darkes you could say he's in remission too.
For Type 2's remission is feasible by dietary change (maybe with minimal medication) so is a completely different thing. Mainly because the two conditions have completely different causes even if they share a name.
I'm afraid I was spoiled by the Med a couple of weeks ago.. not been in the Channel so far this year...Have you ventured into the Channel over the last two weeks
Actually, a diabetic friend of mine (in Leeds, where the CCG seems to have an abundant amount of cash. I'm seriously thinking of relocating) just had a gastric bypass. She had to "follow a special diet" for three weeks before hand to "shrink the liver", but when I looked over the sheet she'd been given, it was very clearly a very-low-carb diet.
She was plunged (as we know and see all too often) into an immediate state of keto flu, couldn't keep warm, couldn't stay awake. But even before the operation, her Hba1c was the lowest it had ever been in 15 years, her liver had shrunk "to normal size" and she'd lost 3 clothes sizes.
This was just run-of-the-mill NHS treatment and, I have to admit, I was impressed. It was nice to be able to explain to her what was happening in her body, why the diet was working and how to ease the keto flu symptoms.
Now, 3 months along, she's lost 6 sizes, her energy is back, her arthritic pain has significantly lessened, she's still off the carbs (though less rigidly so), and her consultant predicts she may never have symptoms of diabetes again.
Honestly, given the option and having seen what it's done for her, I'd leap at the chance for surgery.
But this is just agreed between 2 people. I don't think there are any guidelines. If there are then I would love to know.
I made no comment on my own views on this, but do bear in mind the statement, although taken from Twitter, is part of a BMJ article, as annotated at the bottom of the snip:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?