Data from the UK’s national nutrition survey showed no Britons had levels of vitamin D as high as those found at the top end in the study, which may have been affected by the fish-rich diet enjoyed by many Danish people, she said.
‘The Danes actually get a lot more sun exposure than Britons and eat a lot of oily fish. Although this is healthy in moderation, oily fish also contains high levels of vitamin A which can be harmful and toxins which may have had an effect on people’s health.
‘One-quarter of Britons go into the summer with levels of vitamin D below the level for optimal health, we have the problem of too many people consuming too little of the vitamin’ she added.
In the UK, the Food Standards Agency does not recommend a specific daily dose of vitamin D unless you are elderly, pregnant, Asian, get little sun exposure and eat no meat or oily fish when 10mcg is advised.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... z1wMFpfLvY
borofergie said:That's me stuffed then. I just started supplementing with 5000 IU a day (the recommended dose on the packet is 10,000 IU a week). I must admit, I've been feeling extra-wonderful since I started doing it.
Now it seems that I've increased my chance of dying by 40% (which I thought was more or less 100% anyway, in the end).
Defren said:Stephen if you read the article the study was done in Denmark where they have more sunshine and eat more oily fish, so this report doesn't really apply to us. I take between 4000 and 6000iu as a supplement each day. I ain't dead yet. :lol:
Stephen if you read the article the study was done in Denmark where they have more sunshine and eat more oily fish, so this report doesn't really apply to us. I take between 4000 and 6000iu as a supplement each day. I ain't dead yet
borofergie said:(Being the Daily Mail, I'm surprised they didn't make the connection between hot-places, VitD and asylum seekers).
Found this article rather alarming
Similarly, both high and low levels of albumin-adjusted serum calcium and serum PTH were associated with an increased mortality[/quote
http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/ea ... 6.abstract
Somehow this didn't get mentioned.
Is it less attention-grabbing ?
Been looking for figures with little success. Only that 6.1% of the study participants died within an average of three years.
I'd love to see more details of those deaths than the vit D level.
Copenhagen University's website offers little.
Geoff
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?