manda pops
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 79
- Dislikes
- spiders, football, topgear
SouthernGeneral6512 said:It is odd just how many seem to be female ... I keep looking for a fellow male to turn up but one never does.
I suppose female hormones are cyclical and this may in some way mirror the larger range of blood sugars that diabetics tend to have?
CatLadyNZ said:I think we need a cut and paste of text about retinopathy like we have for diabetes in general. It seems to freak people out more than it should, in my opinion.
I have very early retinopathy and am concerned but not freaking out. From what I've read about it, it is more common in older diabetics, but young ones can sometimes get it. So every diabetic should be told about prevention and screening.
CatLadyNZ said:So every diabetic should be told about prevention and screening.
Unbeliever said:CatLadyNZ said:I think we need a cut and paste of text about retinopathy like we have for diabetes in general. It seems to freak people out more than it should, in my opinion.
I have very early retinopathy and am concerned but not freaking out. From what I've read about it, it is more common in older diabetics, but young ones can sometimes get it. So every diabetic should be told about prevention and screening.
That's very good idea. I have been thinking the same thing for a while. With screening more people are affected or conscious of the complication but new threads about it seem to appear every week.
Somewhere to findimmmediate information and hopefully, reassurance is an excellent idea.
I found this interesting because it is often said that bringing blood sugar under control can make retinopathy worse. I've just had my 3 monthly examination and the doctor said my right eye had improved with better control and reduced blood pressure (left eye just the same)CatLadyNZ said:I saw my optometrist today and he explained diabetic retinopathy in more detail for me. It was really interesting. I can't remember much of the detail but I felt reassured for myself. Which is a blessing because I am battling depression.
One thing he said was that often when people come in for that first "baseline" screening soon after diagnosis, they have one or two dots, like me, (mine's a micro-aneurysm if anyone's interested) and they record it and check again in 6 and maybe 12 months and it's gone, because the person has started managing their diabetes and has "good control" as opposed to more or less rampant hyperglycaemia that most of us seem to have when we are diagnosed (T2 I'm talking about).
He also said that my dot will not do me any harm, even if it never goes away. It's just an "indicator" of my vascular health. I know I'm at risk of diabetes complications for a bunch of reasons - I've had hypertension for at least 5 years and have just started to have high cholesterol. BP, cholesterol and glucose are the three things we have to target all at the same time. I allowed one to get out of control and it affected the others.
Knowledge is power. If you don't know, ask, and keep asking, until someone gives you an answer you can understand and trust.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?