Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Get Involved
Book and Product Reviews
Fats that Heal & Fats that Kill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 1199980" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>It was a rebuttal he made on the ADA nutrition guidelines where he strongly disagreed with their statement</p><p><<<strong><em>sucrose-containing foods can be substituted for other carbohydrates in the meal plan or, if added to the meal plan, covered with insulin or other glucose lowering medications.” While substituting sucrose-containing foods for isocaloric amounts of other carbohydrates may have similar blood glucose effect</em></strong>>> since not all calories are equal. This was reported in the New York Times, but I cannot provide a reference since it was one of my browser travels that I did not track since I was researching something else at the time. The popular press is my source. Looking at the ADA recent guidelines, it seems they did not accept his arguments.</p><p>Edit to Add: You are right. Apart from the extract above, i can find no corraboration to my assertion. It was definitely the New York Times, and I was researching SFA not being the big bogeyman we thought, In UK it is, but Richard was mentioned as prime antagonist in the Sugar is Toxic debate in USA, along with Lustig. I took it at face value which was an error on my part. I do not have subscription to NYT so cannot find the article again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 1199980, member: 196898"] It was a rebuttal he made on the ADA nutrition guidelines where he strongly disagreed with their statement <<[B][I]sucrose-containing foods can be substituted for other carbohydrates in the meal plan or, if added to the meal plan, covered with insulin or other glucose lowering medications.” While substituting sucrose-containing foods for isocaloric amounts of other carbohydrates may have similar blood glucose effect[/I][/B]>> since not all calories are equal. This was reported in the New York Times, but I cannot provide a reference since it was one of my browser travels that I did not track since I was researching something else at the time. The popular press is my source. Looking at the ADA recent guidelines, it seems they did not accept his arguments. Edit to Add: You are right. Apart from the extract above, i can find no corraboration to my assertion. It was definitely the New York Times, and I was researching SFA not being the big bogeyman we thought, In UK it is, but Richard was mentioned as prime antagonist in the Sugar is Toxic debate in USA, along with Lustig. I took it at face value which was an error on my part. I do not have subscription to NYT so cannot find the article again. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Get Involved
Book and Product Reviews
Fats that Heal & Fats that Kill
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…