Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Get Involved
Book and Product Reviews
Fats that Heal & Fats that Kill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Indy51" data-source="post: 1205356" data-attributes="member: 48386"><p>Sorry, no I haven't run across that information. I was judging by the average of other SNPs I had for other diseases - the one that came closest to Type 2 was 11 for macular degeneration (and there's a family history of that, though none for Type 2 that I know of).</p><p></p><p>A lot also depends on the state of the research and how many studies have been done for specific diseases, eg. I know a lot of research has been done on macular degeneration. I figure a lot must have been done on prostate cancer as I came up with heaps of SNPs for that - thankfully I'm female so presumably don't have to worry about it <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>And of course the research is evolving and changing all the time - also research into specific diseases depends very much on funding, etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Indy51, post: 1205356, member: 48386"] Sorry, no I haven't run across that information. I was judging by the average of other SNPs I had for other diseases - the one that came closest to Type 2 was 11 for macular degeneration (and there's a family history of that, though none for Type 2 that I know of). A lot also depends on the state of the research and how many studies have been done for specific diseases, eg. I know a lot of research has been done on macular degeneration. I figure a lot must have been done on prostate cancer as I came up with heaps of SNPs for that - thankfully I'm female so presumably don't have to worry about it :D And of course the research is evolving and changing all the time - also research into specific diseases depends very much on funding, etc. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Get Involved
Book and Product Reviews
Fats that Heal & Fats that Kill
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…