Hi Josie,
I know exactly what you mean. A reading of 12 is high for me now...but even now, with my pump, and also the best control I have ever had, a reading of 12 is not that remarkable. In my old days, a 12 was fairly normal. The difference between us is, that you are trying, I took the stupid route and ignored it for years..and sufferered the consequences. I have found, that when I have tried to help myself, teh support I get from teh "professionals" has also increased...so they should be happy to help you get your control into, well, control?
Something to bear inmind, is that there are types of people, and all types of diabetics on this forum, which is great. I do not know as much as I should do about T2, but I think, in general terms, a reading of 12 for a type 2, who is on teh correct treatment is quite unusal, whereas T1 can fluctuate by a far greater amount, at both ends of the scale! Obviously, can, and should are different things! Another thing to be aware of, is, that this forum is made up of many lovely people, who have been diabetic for varying lengths of time. I too see peole results on here, and think wow! 95% of teh time, I find it inspiring...if they can do, then so can I...and indeed, I have improved beyond my wildest dreams. Why is this relevant? Well, comparing my numbers with other T1s on here (and it really isn't a "mine is lower than yours" debate, I still see many peole whos control is so amazing it inspires me, however, to my GP, I am his star...I have the best results he has ever seen! ( I think my last HbA1C was 6.6) What this tells me is, if you do get into a comparing numbers frame of mind, with people on this forum, please remember that you are comparing yourself with some of teh best controlled diabetics in the country. The fact that you are here means that you are being proactive, and will be able to improve things. What the meter says is important, but when you are feeling disheartened, the thing to look at is "how much have I improved".
Sorry, that wasn't meant to sound patronising.