Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1.5/LADA Diabetes
Glicazide or Insulin
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 1795593" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>That is an interesting report, and very relevant to this discussion, One thing that stands out in my mind is that one problem noted with the sulfonylurea therapy is that it was difficult to get good metabolic control in any of the RCT trials. This harks back to the early days with the stage 1 sulfanyls that a were not very effective anyway, and secondly were not as good as exogenous insulin for bgl control. So given that beta cells are damaged by high levels of glucose, then their findings are not so surprising. Indeed the particular drug used in the RCT trials is known to be not as effective as Metformin. However there does seem to be an adverse effect on the autoimmune problem that is particular to LADA.</p><p></p><p>The other problem that the RCT trials do not consider is that the standard advice for diabetics has been (and remains) Eat lots of carbs, especially starchy foods, and reduce fats. So it is not surprising that the insulin therapy was more successful when compared to the oral drug being used. It remains to be seen what would happen if these tests were repeated now with a suitable lifestyle change (i,e, LC diet) also in place. Unfortunately that will not happen in the immediate future and is irrelevant to today's discussion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 1795593, member: 196898"] That is an interesting report, and very relevant to this discussion, One thing that stands out in my mind is that one problem noted with the sulfonylurea therapy is that it was difficult to get good metabolic control in any of the RCT trials. This harks back to the early days with the stage 1 sulfanyls that a were not very effective anyway, and secondly were not as good as exogenous insulin for bgl control. So given that beta cells are damaged by high levels of glucose, then their findings are not so surprising. Indeed the particular drug used in the RCT trials is known to be not as effective as Metformin. However there does seem to be an adverse effect on the autoimmune problem that is particular to LADA. The other problem that the RCT trials do not consider is that the standard advice for diabetics has been (and remains) Eat lots of carbs, especially starchy foods, and reduce fats. So it is not surprising that the insulin therapy was more successful when compared to the oral drug being used. It remains to be seen what would happen if these tests were repeated now with a suitable lifestyle change (i,e, LC diet) also in place. Unfortunately that will not happen in the immediate future and is irrelevant to today's discussion. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1.5/LADA Diabetes
Glicazide or Insulin
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…