I don't know about the difference between the reader and the phone but there have been discussions about a hypo (or a high) appearing when scanning but not on the graphs.
My understanding is that the readings from interstitial fluids are about 15 minutes behind true blood readings. The algorithm that Libre 2 uses to convert interstitial fluid readings to blood sugar readings attempts to predict the value in 15 minutes time. If our levels are trending in a straight line (whether flat, up or down), the prediction is not bad. If the trend changes direction, the prediction will be wrong and the graph will be updated in 15 minutes time so the hypo (or high) will "disappear".
For example, if you have a hypo (which you check with a finger prick because Libre is not as accurate at low levels) and you treat it, the trend will change but Libre will take 15 minutes to notice so may temporarily show your hypo levels lower than they actually go.
Keep in mind that there is an error factor with ALL blood glucose measurements (whether blood from the finger or the Libre)
Has anyone noticed with the Libre (both 1 & 2), that the graph depiction of blood glucose level is always set higher on the libre meter than the phone app? It can make a difference when a hypo is indicated on my phone reading and graph, but does not show on the actual Libre meter. Often this then means that magically, a hypo registers on the phone account of things, when doing the scan, but afterwards, still maintains that I am compliant with 100%.....which is nice, as I feel I get away with it!
What this means I do not know, however. I suppose the sensible thing would be to do a finger prick...which I do, sometimes..
I often have this. I've not noticed consistent trends, however quite often the libre app scanning on the phone and the libre handheld reader will give quite different results when scanned no more than seconds apart. I assume it is a difference in the software the app and reader run. But why should the software be different? Has the theory behind converting interstitial fluid to represent blood glucose changed? Confusing.
The difference compared to the test strip reader is more understandable, given the lag (whicg by the way can vary more and much less than 15 minutes) but even the test strips can give quite different readings depending on which finger you use. To make things worse, a couple of journals I've read seem to have the opinion that with increasing technology modern cgms are now as reliable if not more reliable than more traditional blood glucose strip reading metres. So when all 3 methods give different results, which happens at least a few times a month, is it spin the wheel?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?