KevinPotts
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,606
- Location
- Cambridge
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
- Dislikes
- Unkind people, failure to take personal responsibility.
"Swap the sweet nothings for nature's healthiest option- fat, glorious day"...
...so goes the heading of Dominic.lawson@sunday-times.co.uk,page 24 Sunday Times, 29 May 2016.
Lawson attempts to find balance in the furore ignited by the National Obesity Forum and the Public Health Collaboration.
Not sure he'll love you for putting his e-mail address there Kevin.. We can't read it as its behind the Murdoch paywall.. sorry.
I read that article too, Kevin. One of the excellent "sound bites" in it was:
"Fat tastes good because it is good for us — that is evolution at work".
He probably has a point.
Fat tastes good because the fat molecules are the ones that contain the flavour. We evolved because we survived on a high calorie diet. Those that didn't eat fat or couldn't metabolise it - died out, fat first, people came second.I read that article too, Kevin. One of the excellent "sound bites" in it was:
"Fat tastes good because it is good for us — that is evolution at work".
He probably has a point.
I love it that they've managed to confuse diabetes.co.uk and diabetes.org.uk in relation to Arjun (@Administrator) in the article...Ok so, I don't have very sophisticated first thing in the morning reading tastes, but - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rolling-condition-diet-low-carbohydrates.html - today's daily mail article directly focuses on the success of the low carb advice on this forum. It's not got any comments yet though...
We usually buy the ST but the village shop had run out last Sunday so had to settle for The Observer. I'll definitely be buying it this Sunday to read you though @KevinPotts .I can't believe it. I wrote to the author of this article and the editor of the ST contacted me yesterday to say they wanted to reproduce my response this Sunday. I gave permission, so it will be interesting to see if they abridge or edit it, which I am told is a possibility. I'll find it and provide a link so you folks can critique it and tell me what a foolish man I was even contemplating authorising reproduction
Sent from my iPhone using DCUK Forum mobile app
I can't believe it. I wrote to the author of this article and the editor of the ST contacted me yesterday to say they wanted to reproduce my response this Sunday. I gave permission, so it will be interesting to see if they abridge or edit it, which I am told is a possibility. I'll find it and provide a link so you folks can critique it and tell me what a foolish man I was even contemplating authorising reproduction
Sent from my iPhone using DCUK Forum mobile app
Fantastic! It's so great that you took the initiative in responding (respect) and go on them for building on it next week.
I do hope that this is all positive for the LCHF revolution
We usually buy the ST but the village shop had run out last Sunday so had to settle for The Observer. I'll definitely be buying it this Sunday to read you though @KevinPotts .
Here it is. They've just put in the first part and end,but it captures the sentiment.
Diagnosed 13/4/16: T2, no meds, HbA1c 53, FBG 12.6, Trigs 3.6, HDL .75, LDL 4.0, BP 169/95, 13st 8lbs, waist 34" (2012 - 17st 7lbs, w 42").
2/6/16: FBG AV 4.6, Trigs 1.5, HDL 2.0, LDL 3.0, BP 120/72, 11st 11lbs, waist 30" (2012 - 17st 7lbs, w 42").
Regime: 20g LCHF, run 1 mile daily, weekly fasting.
4/6/16: Best BP 112/64....yeah!!
Kevin - I'm an online Times subscriber. What's the header where your comments are published? I'd like to read yours and others a little more comfortably. Thanks!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?