Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Ask A Question
Has anyone ever had a fluorescent angiogram on their eyes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Unbeliever" data-source="post: 286072" data-attributes="member: 30851"><p><strong>Re: Has anyone ever had a fluorescent angiogram on their eye</strong></p><p></p><p>Sorry SG keep meaning to answer your shellfish query but seem to be distracted each time [senility}</p><p></p><p>As I understand it it is not the shellfish in itself it is the fact hat the dye is based on iodine. It is really the iodine allergy they are looking for . Most people would not know if they had an allergy to it but it is likely if a person is allergic to shellfish .</p><p>Thas why they ask you about allergies in general .</p><p></p><p>I have always been assured there is a very small risk in any event. </p><p>Its a very strange thing but I understand that that all the fuss about the angiograms -which frightens the life ou of patients </p><p>and I know i does because i was absoluely terrified the first ime is based on an absolutely miniscule risk of serious side effects</p><p>while the injections I have in the operating yheatre every few months carry a 50% chance of blindness from one cause and 25%</p><p>from another. Although I have to consent each time and am asked about allergies etc and all he procedures with hygeine etc are taken and an anaesthesist is there it is somehow not s intimuidaing as the palaver that used to surround the angiograms</p><p>I can only assume it has something to do wih the hospital's insurance.</p><p></p><p>So if you go blind ias a resukt of a procedure in the operating theatre thats OK but if you were seriously ill as a result of the angiogram it would not please the insureres.</p><p>The allergy question applies in both. Maybe its because angiogramas are now done so frequently and they haven't yet caught up with the injection business.</p><p>But really not to worry SG , your journey o the hospital is probably more risky than the procedure. I have given up worrying now .</p><p>I have found that if I have a problem with any of it it is always with something I never considered or wouldn't have known about </p><p>or have had done dozens of imes before.</p><p></p><p>In some ways being familiar with it all makes life easier but in others it has the opposite effect. Because i am almost an inmate </p><p>I know so many of the saff I also know which are the most efficient and i sudder when certain people are on duty .</p><p></p><p>Apart from procedures which fail and have to be repeated because certain staff are less adep than others the worsre thing hat happened to me was after a caaract op which was combined with another procedure and needed medication for a few weeks afterwards. My penicillin allergy was duly considered and i was given another drug mean o be very safe. Guess what?</p><p>I can't remember ever feeling so ill It ook me 3 weeks to get back to the hospital for my check up,</p><p>Such a reacion has never been recorded before. of course there are always risks with any treatment but wih the scans i think you just have to remeber hat hey are used daily for many conditions.</p><p>I have noticed that they are using much less dye nowadays in order to reduce the possible effect on patients. So you shouldn# be yellow for long!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Unbeliever, post: 286072, member: 30851"] [b]Re: Has anyone ever had a fluorescent angiogram on their eye[/b] Sorry SG keep meaning to answer your shellfish query but seem to be distracted each time [senility} As I understand it it is not the shellfish in itself it is the fact hat the dye is based on iodine. It is really the iodine allergy they are looking for . Most people would not know if they had an allergy to it but it is likely if a person is allergic to shellfish . Thas why they ask you about allergies in general . I have always been assured there is a very small risk in any event. Its a very strange thing but I understand that that all the fuss about the angiograms -which frightens the life ou of patients and I know i does because i was absoluely terrified the first ime is based on an absolutely miniscule risk of serious side effects while the injections I have in the operating yheatre every few months carry a 50% chance of blindness from one cause and 25% from another. Although I have to consent each time and am asked about allergies etc and all he procedures with hygeine etc are taken and an anaesthesist is there it is somehow not s intimuidaing as the palaver that used to surround the angiograms I can only assume it has something to do wih the hospital's insurance. So if you go blind ias a resukt of a procedure in the operating theatre thats OK but if you were seriously ill as a result of the angiogram it would not please the insureres. The allergy question applies in both. Maybe its because angiogramas are now done so frequently and they haven't yet caught up with the injection business. But really not to worry SG , your journey o the hospital is probably more risky than the procedure. I have given up worrying now . I have found that if I have a problem with any of it it is always with something I never considered or wouldn't have known about or have had done dozens of imes before. In some ways being familiar with it all makes life easier but in others it has the opposite effect. Because i am almost an inmate I know so many of the saff I also know which are the most efficient and i sudder when certain people are on duty . Apart from procedures which fail and have to be repeated because certain staff are less adep than others the worsre thing hat happened to me was after a caaract op which was combined with another procedure and needed medication for a few weeks afterwards. My penicillin allergy was duly considered and i was given another drug mean o be very safe. Guess what? I can't remember ever feeling so ill It ook me 3 weeks to get back to the hospital for my check up, Such a reacion has never been recorded before. of course there are always risks with any treatment but wih the scans i think you just have to remeber hat hey are used daily for many conditions. I have noticed that they are using much less dye nowadays in order to reduce the possible effect on patients. So you shouldn# be yellow for long! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Ask A Question
Has anyone ever had a fluorescent angiogram on their eyes?
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…